[PATCH net] net: dsa: Do not register devlink for unused ports

Subsystems: networking [dsa], networking [general], the rest

STALE3003d

2 messages, 1 author, 2018-05-17 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH net] net: dsa: Do not register devlink for unused ports

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-05-17 22:16:53

Even if commit 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports") indicated
that registering a devlink instance for unused ports is not a problem, and this
is true, this can be confusing nonetheless, so let's not do it.

Fixes: 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports")
Reported-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
 net/dsa/dsa2.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
index adf50fbc4c13..cc45a8ca45fb 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
@@ -262,13 +262,14 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
 
 	memset(&dp->devlink_port, 0, sizeof(dp->devlink_port));
 
+	if (dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED)
+		return 0;
+
 	err = devlink_port_register(ds->devlink, &dp->devlink_port, dp->index);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
 	switch (dp->type) {
-	case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
-		break;
 	case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
 	case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
 		err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp);
@@ -293,11 +294,12 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
 
 static void dsa_port_teardown(struct dsa_port *dp)
 {
+	if (dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED)
+		return;
+
 	devlink_port_unregister(&dp->devlink_port);
 
 	switch (dp->type) {
-	case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
-		break;
 	case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
 	case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
 		dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp);
-- 
2.14.1

Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: Do not register devlink for unused ports

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-05-17 22:29:34

On 05/17/2018 03:16 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted hunk
Even if commit 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports") indicated
that registering a devlink instance for unused ports is not a problem, and this
is true, this can be confusing nonetheless, so let's not do it.

Fixes: 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports")
Reported-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
 net/dsa/dsa2.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
index adf50fbc4c13..cc45a8ca45fb 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
@@ -262,13 +262,14 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
 
 	memset(&dp->devlink_port, 0, sizeof(dp->devlink_port));
 
+	if (dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED)
+		return 0;
+
 	err = devlink_port_register(ds->devlink, &dp->devlink_port, dp->index);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
 	switch (dp->type) {
-	case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
-		break;
 	case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
 	case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
 		err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp);
@@ -293,11 +294,12 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
 
 static void dsa_port_teardown(struct dsa_port *dp)
 {
+	if (dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED)
+		return;
+
 	devlink_port_unregister(&dp->devlink_port);
 
 	switch (dp->type) {
-	case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
-		break;
Actually those should be kept in there in order not to generate a
warning about DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED not being handled by the switch()
case statement, I will resubmit that shortly, or we could even move the
registration until after, either way is likely fine.
-- 
Florian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help