linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  net/tls/tls_main.c

between commit:

  98f0a39529e5 ("tls: fix use after free in tls_sk_proto_close")

from the net tree and commit:

  f66de3ee2c16 ("net/tls: Split conf to rx + tx")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/tls/tls_main.c
index 20cd93be6236,4b57ddd72f34..000000000000

--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c

@@@ -254,8 -252,12 +254,9 @@@ static void tls_sk_proto_close(struct s
  	lock_sock(sk);
  	sk_proto_close = ctx->sk_proto_close;
  
- 	if (ctx->conf == TLS_BASE || ctx->conf == TLS_HW_RECORD) {
 -	if (ctx->tx_conf == TLS_HW_RECORD && ctx->rx_conf == TLS_HW_RECORD)
 -		goto skip_tx_cleanup;
 -
 -	if (ctx->tx_conf == TLS_BASE && ctx->rx_conf == TLS_BASE) {
 -		kfree(ctx);
 -		ctx = NULL;
++	if ((ctx->tx_conf == TLS_BASE && ctx->rx_conf == TLS_BASE) ||
++	    (ctx->tx_conf == TLS_HW_RECORD && ctx->rx_conf == TLS_HW_RECORD)) {
 +		free_ctx = true;
  		goto skip_tx_cleanup;
  	}