[PATCH net-next] net/smc: init conn.tx_work & conn.send_lock sooner

Subsystems: networking [general], shared memory communications (smc) sockets, the rest

STALE2999d

7 messages, 3 authors, 2018-05-17 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH net-next] net/smc: init conn.tx_work & conn.send_lock sooner

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2018-05-17 10:54:28

syzkaller found that following program crashes the host :

{
  int fd = socket(AF_SMC, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
  int val = 1;

  listen(fd, 0);
  shutdown(fd, SHUT_RDWR);
  setsockopt(fd, 6, TCP_NODELAY, &val, 4);
}

Simply initialize conn.tx_work & conn.send_lock at socket creation,
rather than deeper in the stack.

ODEBUG: assert_init not available (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint:           (null)
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13988 at lib/debugobjects.c:329 debug_print_object+0x16a/0x210 lib/debugobjects.c:326
Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...

CPU: 1 PID: 13988 Comm: syz-executor0 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc4+ #46
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x1b9/0x294 lib/dump_stack.c:113
 panic+0x22f/0x4de kernel/panic.c:184
 __warn.cold.8+0x163/0x1b3 kernel/panic.c:536
 report_bug+0x252/0x2d0 lib/bug.c:186
 fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:178 [inline]
 do_error_trap+0x1de/0x490 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:296
 do_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:315
 invalid_op+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:992
RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x16a/0x210 lib/debugobjects.c:326
RSP: 0018:ffff880197a37880 EFLAGS: 00010086
RAX: 0000000000000061 RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: ffffc90001ed0000
RDX: 0000000000004aaf RSI: ffffffff8160f6f1 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffff880197a378c0 R08: ffff8801aa7a0080 R09: ffffed003b5e3eb2
R10: ffffed003b5e3eb2 R11: ffff8801daf1f597 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: ffffffff88d96980 R14: ffffffff87fa19a0 R15: ffffffff81666ec0
 debug_object_assert_init+0x309/0x500 lib/debugobjects.c:692
 debug_timer_assert_init kernel/time/timer.c:724 [inline]
 debug_assert_init kernel/time/timer.c:776 [inline]
 del_timer+0x74/0x140 kernel/time/timer.c:1198
 try_to_grab_pending+0x439/0x9a0 kernel/workqueue.c:1223
 mod_delayed_work_on+0x91/0x250 kernel/workqueue.c:1592
 mod_delayed_work include/linux/workqueue.h:541 [inline]
 smc_setsockopt+0x387/0x6d0 net/smc/af_smc.c:1367
 __sys_setsockopt+0x1bd/0x390 net/socket.c:1903
 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:1914 [inline]
 __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:1911 [inline]
 __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xbe/0x150 net/socket.c:1911
 do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Fixes: 01d2f7e2cdd3 ("net/smc: sockopts TCP_NODELAY and TCP_CORK")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Ursula Braun <redacted>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot <redacted>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c | 2 ++
 net/smc/smc_tx.c | 4 +---
 net/smc/smc_tx.h | 1 +
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index d15762b057c0d8d4167feca9a4c41f0408604c37..6ad4f6c771c3fa63d3ae714dbe65879910963a21 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -193,8 +193,10 @@ static struct sock *smc_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
 	sk->sk_protocol = protocol;
 	smc = smc_sk(sk);
 	INIT_WORK(&smc->tcp_listen_work, smc_tcp_listen_work);
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&smc->conn.tx_work, smc_tx_work);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&smc->accept_q);
 	spin_lock_init(&smc->accept_q_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&smc->conn.send_lock);
 	sk->sk_prot->hash(sk);
 	sk_refcnt_debug_inc(sk);
 
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.c b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
index 58dfe0bd9d6075b5d3db97c659999b364b97da73..08a7de98bb031b5d2256e3238236108749e7ae39 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_tx.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ int smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn)
 /* Wakeup sndbuf consumers from process context
  * since there is more data to transmit
  */
-static void smc_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
+void smc_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct smc_connection *conn = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
 						   struct smc_connection,
@@ -512,6 +512,4 @@ void smc_tx_consumer_update(struct smc_connection *conn)
 void smc_tx_init(struct smc_sock *smc)
 {
 	smc->sk.sk_write_space = smc_tx_write_space;
-	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&smc->conn.tx_work, smc_tx_work);
-	spin_lock_init(&smc->conn.send_lock);
 }
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.h b/net/smc/smc_tx.h
index 78255964fa4dc1c69f96548e035e74a167999a62..8f64b12bf03c1b52c599b1239784a404efe65dae 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_tx.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static inline int smc_tx_prepared_sends(struct smc_connection *conn)
 	return smc_curs_diff(conn->sndbuf_size, &sent, &prep);
 }
 
+void smc_tx_work(struct work_struct *work);
 void smc_tx_init(struct smc_sock *smc);
 int smc_tx_sendmsg(struct smc_sock *smc, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len);
 int smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn);
-- 
2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog

Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: init conn.tx_work & conn.send_lock sooner

From: Ursula Braun <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-17 12:13:55


On 05/17/2018 12:54 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
syzkaller found that following program crashes the host :

{
  int fd = socket(AF_SMC, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
  int val = 1;

  listen(fd, 0);
  shutdown(fd, SHUT_RDWR);
  setsockopt(fd, 6, TCP_NODELAY, &val, 4);
}

Simply initialize conn.tx_work & conn.send_lock at socket creation,
rather than deeper in the stack.

ODEBUG: assert_init not available (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint:           (null)
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13988 at lib/debugobjects.c:329 debug_print_object+0x16a/0x210 lib/debugobjects.c:326
Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...

CPU: 1 PID: 13988 Comm: syz-executor0 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc4+ #46
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x1b9/0x294 lib/dump_stack.c:113
 panic+0x22f/0x4de kernel/panic.c:184
 __warn.cold.8+0x163/0x1b3 kernel/panic.c:536
 report_bug+0x252/0x2d0 lib/bug.c:186
 fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:178 [inline]
 do_error_trap+0x1de/0x490 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:296
 do_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:315
 invalid_op+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:992
RIP: 0010:debug_print_object+0x16a/0x210 lib/debugobjects.c:326
RSP: 0018:ffff880197a37880 EFLAGS: 00010086
RAX: 0000000000000061 RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: ffffc90001ed0000
RDX: 0000000000004aaf RSI: ffffffff8160f6f1 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffff880197a378c0 R08: ffff8801aa7a0080 R09: ffffed003b5e3eb2
R10: ffffed003b5e3eb2 R11: ffff8801daf1f597 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: ffffffff88d96980 R14: ffffffff87fa19a0 R15: ffffffff81666ec0
 debug_object_assert_init+0x309/0x500 lib/debugobjects.c:692
 debug_timer_assert_init kernel/time/timer.c:724 [inline]
 debug_assert_init kernel/time/timer.c:776 [inline]
 del_timer+0x74/0x140 kernel/time/timer.c:1198
 try_to_grab_pending+0x439/0x9a0 kernel/workqueue.c:1223
 mod_delayed_work_on+0x91/0x250 kernel/workqueue.c:1592
 mod_delayed_work include/linux/workqueue.h:541 [inline]
 smc_setsockopt+0x387/0x6d0 net/smc/af_smc.c:1367
 __sys_setsockopt+0x1bd/0x390 net/socket.c:1903
 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:1914 [inline]
 __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:1911 [inline]
 __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xbe/0x150 net/socket.c:1911
 do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
This problem should no longer show up with yesterday's net-next commit
569bc6436568 ("net/smc: no tx work trigger for fallback sockets").
 
quoted hunk
Fixes: 01d2f7e2cdd3 ("net/smc: sockopts TCP_NODELAY and TCP_CORK")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Ursula Braun <redacted>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot <redacted>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c | 2 ++
 net/smc/smc_tx.c | 4 +---
 net/smc/smc_tx.h | 1 +
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index d15762b057c0d8d4167feca9a4c41f0408604c37..6ad4f6c771c3fa63d3ae714dbe65879910963a21 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -193,8 +193,10 @@ static struct sock *smc_sock_alloc(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
 	sk->sk_protocol = protocol;
 	smc = smc_sk(sk);
 	INIT_WORK(&smc->tcp_listen_work, smc_tcp_listen_work);
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&smc->conn.tx_work, smc_tx_work);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&smc->accept_q);
 	spin_lock_init(&smc->accept_q_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&smc->conn.send_lock);
 	sk->sk_prot->hash(sk);
 	sk_refcnt_debug_inc(sk);
 
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.c b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
index 58dfe0bd9d6075b5d3db97c659999b364b97da73..08a7de98bb031b5d2256e3238236108749e7ae39 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_tx.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ int smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn)
 /* Wakeup sndbuf consumers from process context
  * since there is more data to transmit
  */
-static void smc_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
+void smc_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct smc_connection *conn = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
 						   struct smc_connection,
@@ -512,6 +512,4 @@ void smc_tx_consumer_update(struct smc_connection *conn)
 void smc_tx_init(struct smc_sock *smc)
 {
 	smc->sk.sk_write_space = smc_tx_write_space;
-	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&smc->conn.tx_work, smc_tx_work);
-	spin_lock_init(&smc->conn.send_lock);
 }
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.h b/net/smc/smc_tx.h
index 78255964fa4dc1c69f96548e035e74a167999a62..8f64b12bf03c1b52c599b1239784a404efe65dae 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_tx.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static inline int smc_tx_prepared_sends(struct smc_connection *conn)
 	return smc_curs_diff(conn->sndbuf_size, &sent, &prep);
 }
 
+void smc_tx_work(struct work_struct *work);
 void smc_tx_init(struct smc_sock *smc);
 int smc_tx_sendmsg(struct smc_sock *smc, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len);
 int smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn);

Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: init conn.tx_work & conn.send_lock sooner

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2018-05-17 12:20:44

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:13 AM Ursula Braun [off-list ref] wrote:
This problem should no longer show up with yesterday's net-next commit
569bc6436568 ("net/smc: no tx work trigger for fallback sockets").
It definitely triggers on latest net-next, which includes 569bc6436568

Thanks.

Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: init conn.tx_work & conn.send_lock sooner

From: Ursula Braun <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-17 13:58:03


On 05/17/2018 02:20 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:13 AM Ursula Braun [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This problem should no longer show up with yesterday's net-next commit
569bc6436568 ("net/smc: no tx work trigger for fallback sockets").
It definitely triggers on latest net-next, which includes 569bc6436568

Thanks.
Sorry, my fault. 

Your proposed patch solves the problem. On the other hand the purpose of
smc_tx_init() has been to cover tx-related socket initializations needed for
connection sockets only. tx_work is something that should be scheduled only
for active connection sockets in non-fallback mode.
Thus I prefer this alternate patch to solve the problem:

---
 net/smc/af_smc.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1362,14 +1362,18 @@ static int smc_setsockopt(struct socket
 		}
 		break;
 	case TCP_NODELAY:
-		if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT && sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN) {
+		if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT &&
+		    sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN &&
+		    sk->sk_state != SMC_CLOSED) {
 			if (val && !smc->use_fallback)
 				mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &smc->conn.tx_work,
 						 0);
 		}
 		break;
 	case TCP_CORK:
-		if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT && sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN) {
+		if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT &&
+		    sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN &&
+		    sk->sk_state != SMC_CLOSED) {
 			if (!val && !smc->use_fallback)
 				mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &smc->conn.tx_work,
 						 0);
What do you think?

Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: init conn.tx_work & conn.send_lock sooner

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2018-05-17 15:29:07

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:58 AM Ursula Braun [off-list ref] wrote:


On 05/17/2018 02:20 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:13 AM Ursula Braun [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
quoted
This problem should no longer show up with yesterday's net-next commit
569bc6436568 ("net/smc: no tx work trigger for fallback sockets").
It definitely triggers on latest net-next, which includes 569bc6436568

Thanks.
Sorry, my fault.
Your proposed patch solves the problem. On the other hand the purpose of
smc_tx_init() has been to cover tx-related socket initializations needed
for
connection sockets only. tx_work is something that should be scheduled
only
for active connection sockets in non-fallback mode.
Thus I prefer this alternate patch to solve the problem:
---
  net/smc/af_smc.c |    8 ++++++--
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
quoted hunk
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1362,14 +1362,18 @@ static int smc_setsockopt(struct socket
                 }
                 break;
         case TCP_NODELAY:
-               if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT && sk->sk_state !=
SMC_LISTEN) {
+               if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT &&
+                   sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN &&
+                   sk->sk_state != SMC_CLOSED) {
                         if (val && !smc->use_fallback)
                                 mod_delayed_work(system_wq,
&smc->conn.tx_work,
                                                  0);
                 }
                 break;
         case TCP_CORK:
-               if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT && sk->sk_state !=
SMC_LISTEN) {
+               if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT &&
+                   sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN &&
+                   sk->sk_state != SMC_CLOSED) {
                         if (!val && !smc->use_fallback)
                                 mod_delayed_work(system_wq,
&smc->conn.tx_work,
                                                  0);
What do you think?
I think my patch is cleaner.

Deferring spinlock and workqueues setup is a recipe for disaster.

Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: init conn.tx_work & conn.send_lock sooner

From: Ursula Braun <hidden>
Date: 2018-05-17 16:31:20


On 05/17/2018 05:28 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:58 AM Ursula Braun [off-list ref] wrote:


quoted
On 05/17/2018 02:20 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:13 AM Ursula Braun [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
This problem should no longer show up with yesterday's net-next commit
569bc6436568 ("net/smc: no tx work trigger for fallback sockets").
It definitely triggers on latest net-next, which includes 569bc6436568

Thanks.
quoted
Sorry, my fault.
quoted
Your proposed patch solves the problem. On the other hand the purpose of
smc_tx_init() has been to cover tx-related socket initializations needed
for
quoted
connection sockets only. tx_work is something that should be scheduled
only
quoted
for active connection sockets in non-fallback mode.
Thus I prefer this alternate patch to solve the problem:
quoted
---
  net/smc/af_smc.c |    8 ++++++--
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
quoted
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1362,14 +1362,18 @@ static int smc_setsockopt(struct socket
                 }
                 break;
         case TCP_NODELAY:
-               if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT && sk->sk_state !=
SMC_LISTEN) {
quoted
+               if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT &&
+                   sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN &&
+                   sk->sk_state != SMC_CLOSED) {
                         if (val && !smc->use_fallback)
                                 mod_delayed_work(system_wq,
&smc->conn.tx_work,
quoted
                                                  0);
                 }
                 break;
         case TCP_CORK:
-               if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT && sk->sk_state !=
SMC_LISTEN) {
quoted
+               if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT &&
+                   sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN &&
+                   sk->sk_state != SMC_CLOSED) {
                         if (!val && !smc->use_fallback)
                                 mod_delayed_work(system_wq,
&smc->conn.tx_work,
quoted
                                                  0);
quoted
What do you think?
I think my patch is cleaner.

Deferring spinlock and workqueues setup is a recipe for disaster.
If your solution is preferred, I agree. In this case my today's net/smc patch
   net/smc: initialize tx_work before llc initial handshake
for the net-tree is obsolete.

Re: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: init conn.tx_work & conn.send_lock sooner

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2018-05-17 20:25:55

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 03:54:21 -0700
syzkaller found that following program crashes the host :

{
  int fd = socket(AF_SMC, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
  int val = 1;

  listen(fd, 0);
  shutdown(fd, SHUT_RDWR);
  setsockopt(fd, 6, TCP_NODELAY, &val, 4);
}

Simply initialize conn.tx_work & conn.send_lock at socket creation,
rather than deeper in the stack.
 ...
Fixes: 01d2f7e2cdd3 ("net/smc: sockopts TCP_NODELAY and TCP_CORK")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Ursula Braun <redacted>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot <redacted>
Applied, thanks Eric.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help