# Re: \[PATCH iproute2-next 2/3\] ipmroute: don't complain about unicast routes

- From: Sergei Shtylyov \<hidden\>
- Date: 2018-03-07 08:43:36 
- List: netdev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2018/03/11090603
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2018/03/11089999/t.md

```text
Hello!

On 3/7/2018 4:03 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> From: Stephen Hemminger <redacted>
>
> Every non-multicast route prints an error message.
> Kernel doesn't filter out unicast routes, it is up to filter function
> to do this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
>   ip/ipmroute.c | 7 +++----
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ip/ipmroute.c b/ip/ipmroute.c
> index aa5029b44f41..03ca0575e571 100644
> --- a/ip/ipmroute.c
> +++ b/ip/ipmroute.c
> @@ -75,15 +75,14 @@ int print_mroute(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg)
>   		fprintf(stderr, "BUG: wrong nlmsg len %d\n", len);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
> -	if (r->rtm_type != RTN_MULTICAST) {
> -		fprintf(stderr, "Not a multicast route (type: %s)\n",
> -			rtnl_rtntype_n2a(r->rtm_type, b1, sizeof(b1)));
> +
> +	if (r->rtm_type != RTN_MULTICAST)
>   		return 0;
> -	}
>   
>   	parse_rtattr(tb, RTA_MAX, RTM_RTA(r), len);
>   	table = rtm_get_table(r, tb);
>   
> +

   Why?

>   	if (filter.tb > 0 && filter.tb != table)
>   		return 0;
>   

MBR, Sergei
```