From: Jason Wang <hidden> Date: 2018-02-24 03:32:36
This reverts commit 762c330d670e3d4b795cf7a8d761866fdd1eef49. The
reason is we try to batch packets for devmap which causes calling
xdp_do_flush() in the process context. Simply disabling preemption
may not work since process may move among processors which lead
xdp_do_flush() to miss some flushes on some processors.
So simply revert the patch, a follow-up patch will add the xdp flush
correctly.
Reported-by: Christoffer Dall <redacted>
Fixes: 762c330d670e ("tuntap: add missing xdp flush")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <redacted>
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 15 ---------------
1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
From: Jason Wang <hidden> Date: 2018-02-24 03:32:41
Except for tuntap, all other drivers' XDP was implemented at NAPI
poll() routine in a bh. This guarantees all XDP operation were done at
the same CPU which is required by e.g BFP_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY. But
for tuntap, we do it in process context and we try to protect XDP
processing by RCU reader lock. This is insufficient since
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU can preempt the RCU reader critical section which
breaks the assumption that all XDP were processed in the same CPU.
Fixing this by simply disabling preemption during XDP processing.
Fixes: 761876c857cb ("tap: XDP support")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <redacted>
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
From: Jason Wang <hidden> Date: 2018-02-24 03:32:52
We don't flush batched XDP packets through xdp_do_flush_map(), this
will cause packets stall at TX queue. Consider we don't do XDP on NAPI
poll(), the only possible fix is to call xdp_do_flush_map()
immediately after xdp_do_redirect().
Note, this in fact won't try to batch packets through devmap, we could
address in the future.
Reported-by: Christoffer Dall <redacted>
Fixes: 761876c857cb ("tap: XDP support")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <redacted>
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:32:25 +0800
Jason Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
Except for tuntap, all other drivers' XDP was implemented at NAPI
poll() routine in a bh. This guarantees all XDP operation were done at
the same CPU which is required by e.g BFP_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY. But
There is a typo in the defined name "BFP_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY".
Besides it is NOT a requirement that comes from the map type
BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY.
The requirement comes from the bpf_redirect_map helper (and only partly
devmap + cpumap types), as the BPF helper/program stores information in
the per-cpu redirect_info struct (see filter.c), that is used by
xdp_do_redirect() and xdp_do_flush_map().
struct redirect_info {
u32 ifindex;
u32 flags;
struct bpf_map *map;
struct bpf_map *map_to_flush;
unsigned long map_owner;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct redirect_info, redirect_info);
[...]
void xdp_do_flush_map(void)
{
struct redirect_info *ri = this_cpu_ptr(&redirect_info);
struct bpf_map *map = ri->map_to_flush;
[...]
Notice the same redirect_info is used by the TC clsbpf system...
for tuntap, we do it in process context and we try to protect XDP
processing by RCU reader lock. This is insufficient since
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU can preempt the RCU reader critical section which
breaks the assumption that all XDP were processed in the same CPU.
Fixing this by simply disabling preemption during XDP processing.
I guess, this could pamper over the problem...
But I generally find it problematic that the tuntap is not invoking XDP
from NAPI poll() routine in BH-context, as that context provided us
with some protection that allow certain kind of optimizations (like
this flush API). I hope this will not limit us in the future, that
tuntap driver violate the XDP call context.
Fixes: 761876c857cb ("tap: XDP support")
$ git describe --contains 761876c857cb
v4.14-rc1~130^2~270^2
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
From: Jason Wang <hidden> Date: 2018-02-26 13:44:03
On 2018年02月26日 19:02, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:32:25 +0800
Jason Wang [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Except for tuntap, all other drivers' XDP was implemented at NAPI
poll() routine in a bh. This guarantees all XDP operation were done at
the same CPU which is required by e.g BFP_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY. But
There is a typo in the defined name "BFP_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY".
Besides it is NOT a requirement that comes from the map type
BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY.
But it looks to me that bpf_array uses percpu structure, e.g in
percpu_array_map_lookup_elem() it tries to access it through this_cpu_ptr().
The requirement comes from the bpf_redirect_map helper (and only partly
devmap + cpumap types), as the BPF helper/program stores information in
the per-cpu redirect_info struct (see filter.c), that is used by
xdp_do_redirect() and xdp_do_flush_map().
struct redirect_info {
u32 ifindex;
u32 flags;
struct bpf_map *map;
struct bpf_map *map_to_flush;
unsigned long map_owner;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct redirect_info, redirect_info);
[...]
void xdp_do_flush_map(void)
{
struct redirect_info *ri = this_cpu_ptr(&redirect_info);
struct bpf_map *map = ri->map_to_flush;
[...]
Notice the same redirect_info is used by the TC clsbpf system...
quoted
for tuntap, we do it in process context and we try to protect XDP
processing by RCU reader lock. This is insufficient since
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU can preempt the RCU reader critical section which
breaks the assumption that all XDP were processed in the same CPU.
Fixing this by simply disabling preemption during XDP processing.
I guess, this could pamper over the problem...
But I generally find it problematic that the tuntap is not invoking XDP
from NAPI poll() routine in BH-context, as that context provided us
with some protection that allow certain kind of optimizations (like
this flush API). I hope this will not limit us in the future, that
tuntap driver violate the XDP call context.
Good to see tuntap is on the radar :), it was easily forgotten. I was
glad to test anything new in XDP for tuntap. But I do not see any thing
that prevents us from having a similar environment that NAPI poll() can
provides. I admit the flush is inefficient now, but it does not mean we
can't solve it in the future. E.g for the flush, I plan to introduce the
batching API which can accept an array of skb/XDP pointers in its
sendmsg(). Then we can do a more efficient flush.
Note, tuntap supports NAPI (IFF_NAPI), but the main use case is kernel
rx path hardening. Unless rx batching is enabled, it would be slower
than non NAPI mode. Technically, it can support XDP but need more work
(e.g work at the level of XDP buffer instead of skb).
I tend to do fixes or optimizations on the current code unless we find a
real blocker.
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: 2018-02-26 18:50:07
From: Jason Wang <redacted>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:32:24 +0800
This reverts commit 762c330d670e3d4b795cf7a8d761866fdd1eef49. The
reason is we try to batch packets for devmap which causes calling
xdp_do_flush() in the process context. Simply disabling preemption
may not work since process may move among processors which lead
xdp_do_flush() to miss some flushes on some processors.
So simply revert the patch, a follow-up patch will add the xdp flush
correctly.
Reported-by: Christoffer Dall <redacted>
Fixes: 762c330d670e ("tuntap: add missing xdp flush")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <redacted>
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: 2018-02-26 18:50:14
From: Jason Wang <redacted>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:32:25 +0800
Except for tuntap, all other drivers' XDP was implemented at NAPI
poll() routine in a bh. This guarantees all XDP operation were done at
the same CPU which is required by e.g BFP_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY. But
for tuntap, we do it in process context and we try to protect XDP
processing by RCU reader lock. This is insufficient since
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU can preempt the RCU reader critical section which
breaks the assumption that all XDP were processed in the same CPU.
Fixing this by simply disabling preemption during XDP processing.
Fixes: 761876c857cb ("tap: XDP support")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <redacted>
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: 2018-02-26 18:50:25
From: Jason Wang <redacted>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:32:26 +0800
We don't flush batched XDP packets through xdp_do_flush_map(), this
will cause packets stall at TX queue. Consider we don't do XDP on NAPI
poll(), the only possible fix is to call xdp_do_flush_map()
immediately after xdp_do_redirect().
Note, this in fact won't try to batch packets through devmap, we could
address in the future.
Reported-by: Christoffer Dall <redacted>
Fixes: 761876c857cb ("tap: XDP support")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <redacted>
Applied, and all 3 patches queued up for -stable.
Thanks.