This condition wasn't adjusted when PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT (-2) was added
long ago. In case of PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT the MAC interrupt indicates
also PHY state changes and we should do what the symbol says.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- use phy_interrupt_is_valid() instead of checking for irq > 0
---
drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ void phy_start(struct phy_device *phydev)phy_resume(phydev);/* make sure interrupts are re-enabled for the PHY */-if(phydev->irq!=PHY_POLL){+if(phy_interrupt_is_valid(phydev)){err=phy_enable_interrupts(phydev);if(err<0)break;
This condition wasn't adjusted when PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT (-2) was added
long ago. In case of PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT the MAC interrupt indicates
also PHY state changes and we should do what the symbol says.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- use phy_interrupt_is_valid() instead of checking for irq > 0
Thanks, could you identify which Fixes: tag we should be using for that?
It would be great to see this backported to -stable
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ void phy_start(struct phy_device *phydev)phy_resume(phydev);/* make sure interrupts are re-enabled for the PHY */-if(phydev->irq!=PHY_POLL){+if(phy_interrupt_is_valid(phydev)){err=phy_enable_interrupts(phydev);if(err<0)break;
This condition wasn't adjusted when PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT (-2) was added
long ago. In case of PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT the MAC interrupt indicates
also PHY state changes and we should do what the symbol says.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- use phy_interrupt_is_valid() instead of checking for irq > 0
Thanks, could you identify which Fixes: tag we should be using for that?
It would be great to see this backported to -stable
Before submitting the change I had a look at the phylib history for
when the wrong behavior was introduced. However it has been there since
introduction of phylib in 2005. Different patches fixed this in few,
but not all places.
Latest one was 84a527a41f38 "net: phylib: fix interrupts re-enablement
in phy_start" which just partially fixed the issue. So we could
declare the change now to fix this fix.
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ void phy_start(struct phy_device *phydev)phy_resume(phydev);/* make sure interrupts are re-enabled for the PHY */-if(phydev->irq!=PHY_POLL){+if(phy_interrupt_is_valid(phydev)){err=phy_enable_interrupts(phydev);if(err<0)break;