[PATCH bpf] bpf: reject stores into ctx via st and xadd
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2018-01-16 22:30:20
Alexei found that verifier does not reject stores into context
via BPF_ST instead of BPF_STX. And while looking at it, we
also should not allow XADD variant of BPF_STX.
The context rewriter is only assuming either BPF_LDX_MEM- or
BPF_STX_MEM-type operations, thus reject anything other than
that so that assumptions in the rewriter properly hold. Add
test cases as well for BPF selftests.
Fixes: d691f9e8d440 ("bpf: allow programs to write to certain skb fields")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 5423b90..1aff5de 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c@@ -978,6 +978,13 @@ static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, cur_regs(env) + regno); } +static bool is_ctx_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) +{ + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg = cur_regs(env) + regno; + + return reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX; +} + static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int off, int size, bool strict)
@@ -1258,6 +1265,12 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_ins return -EACCES; } + if (is_ctx_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) { + verbose(env, "BPF_XADD stores into R%d context is not allowed\n", + insn->dst_reg); + return -EACCES; + } + /* check whether atomic_add can read the memory */ err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, -1);
@@ -3991,6 +4004,12 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (err) return err; + if (is_ctx_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) { + verbose(env, "BPF_ST stores into R%d context is not allowed\n", + insn->dst_reg); + return -EACCES; + } + /* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */ err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 74cb63e..c34d288 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c@@ -2593,6 +2593,29 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { + "context stores via ST", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark), 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "BPF_ST stores into R1 context is not allowed", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + }, + { + "context stores via XADD", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, + BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark), 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R1 context is not allowed", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + }, + { "direct packet access: test1", .insns = { BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
@@ -4312,7 +4335,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .fixup_map1 = { 2 }, .errstr_unpriv = "R2 leaks addr into mem", .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .result = ACCEPT, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R1 context is not allowed", }, { "leak pointer into ctx 2",
@@ -4326,7 +4350,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .errstr_unpriv = "R10 leaks addr into mem", .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .result = ACCEPT, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "BPF_XADD stores into R1 context is not allowed", }, { "leak pointer into ctx 3",
--
2.9.5