Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2017-12-29

Re: [PATCH][next] wcn36xx: remove redundant assignment to msg_body.min_ch_time

From: Loic Poulain <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-29 07:45:05
Also in: kernel-janitors, linux-wireless, lkml

Hi Colin, Bjorn,

On 26 December 2017 at 21:13, Bjorn Andersson
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue 19 Dec 09:04 PST 2017, Colin King wrote:
quoted
From: Colin Ian King <redacted>

msg_body.min_ch_time is being assigned twice; remove the redundant
first assignment.

Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1463042 ("Unused Value")
Happy to see Coverity working for us :)


This should have had a:

Fixes: 2f3bef4b247e ("wcn36xx: Add hardware scan offload support")
quoted
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
index 2914618a0335..bab2eca5fcac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wcn36xx/smd.c
@@ -625,7 +625,6 @@ int wcn36xx_smd_start_hw_scan(struct wcn36xx *wcn, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
      INIT_HAL_MSG(msg_body, WCN36XX_HAL_START_SCAN_OFFLOAD_REQ);

      msg_body.scan_type = WCN36XX_HAL_SCAN_TYPE_ACTIVE;
-     msg_body.min_ch_time = 30;
      msg_body.min_ch_time = 100;
But I strongly suspect the second line is supposed to be max_ch_time.

@Loic, do you agree?
You're absolutely right.
Colin could you please update your patch accordingly?

Regards,
Loic
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help