[PATCH RESEND 1/3] net: Fix possible race in peernet2id_alloc()

Subsystems: networking [general], the rest

STALE3220d

5 messages, 2 authors, 2017-12-30 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH RESEND 1/3] net: Fix possible race in peernet2id_alloc()

From: Kirill Tkhai <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-29 07:29:49

peernet2id_alloc() is racy without rtnl_lock() as atomic_read(&peer->count)
under net->nsid_lock does not guarantee, peer is alive:

rcu_read_lock()
peernet2id_alloc()                            ..
  spin_lock_bh(&net->nsid_lock)               ..
  atomic_read(&peer->count) == 1              ..
  ..                                          put_net()
  ..                                            cleanup_net()
  ..                                              for_each_net(tmp)
  ..                                                spin_lock_bh(&tmp->nsid_lock)
  ..                                                __peernet2id(tmp, net) == -1
  ..                                                    ..
  ..                                                    ..
    __peernet2id_alloc(alloc == true)                   ..
  ..                                                    ..
rcu_read_unlock()                                       ..
..                                                synchronize_rcu()
..                                                kmem_cache_free(net)

After the above situation, net::netns_id contains id pointing to freed memory,
and any other dereferencing by the id will operate with this freed memory.

Currently, peernet2id_alloc() is used under rtnl_lock() everywhere except
ovs_vport_cmd_fill_info(), and this race can't occur. But peernet2id_alloc()
is generic interface, and better we fix it before someone really starts
use it in wrong context.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <redacted>
---
 net/core/net_namespace.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index 60a71be75aea..6a4eab438221 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -221,17 +221,32 @@ static void rtnl_net_notifyid(struct net *net, int cmd, int id);
  */
 int peernet2id_alloc(struct net *net, struct net *peer)
 {
-	bool alloc;
+	bool alloc = false, alive = false;
 	int id;
 
-	if (atomic_read(&net->count) == 0)
-		return NETNSA_NSID_NOT_ASSIGNED;
 	spin_lock_bh(&net->nsid_lock);
-	alloc = atomic_read(&peer->count) == 0 ? false : true;
+	/* Spinlock guarantees we never hash a peer to net->netns_ids
+	 * after idr_destroy(&net->netns_ids) occurs in cleanup_net().
+	 */
+	if (atomic_read(&net->count) == 0) {
+		id = NETNSA_NSID_NOT_ASSIGNED;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * When peer is obtained from RCU lists, we may race with
+	 * its cleanup. Check whether it's alive, and this guarantees
+	 * we never hash a peer back to net->netns_ids, after it has
+	 * just been idr_remove()'d from there in cleanup_net().
+	 */
+	if (maybe_get_net(peer))
+		alive = alloc = true;
 	id = __peernet2id_alloc(net, peer, &alloc);
+unlock:
 	spin_unlock_bh(&net->nsid_lock);
 	if (alloc && id >= 0)
 		rtnl_net_notifyid(net, RTM_NEWNSID, id);
+	if (alive)
+		put_net(peer);
 	return id;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(peernet2id_alloc);

[PATCH RESEND 2/3] net: Add BUG_ON() to get_net()

From: Kirill Tkhai <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-29 07:30:03

Since people may mistakenly obtain destroying net
from net_namespace_list and from net::netns_ids
without checking for its net::counter, let's protect
against such situations and insert BUG_ON() to stop
move on after this.

Panic is better, than memory corruption and undefined
behavior.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <redacted>
---
 include/net/net_namespace.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/net_namespace.h b/include/net/net_namespace.h
index 10f99dafd5ac..ff0e47471d5b 100644
--- a/include/net/net_namespace.h
+++ b/include/net/net_namespace.h
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ void __put_net(struct net *net);
 
 static inline struct net *get_net(struct net *net)
 {
-	atomic_inc(&net->count);
+	BUG_ON(atomic_inc_return(&net->count) <= 1);
 	return net;
 }
 

[PATCH RESEND 3/3] net: Remove spinlock from get_net_ns_by_id()

From: Kirill Tkhai <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-29 07:30:16

idr_find() is safe under rcu_read_lock() and
maybe_get_net() guarantees that net is alive.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <redacted>
---
 net/core/net_namespace.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index 6a4eab438221..a675f35a18ff 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -279,11 +279,9 @@ struct net *get_net_ns_by_id(struct net *net, int id)
 		return NULL;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	spin_lock_bh(&net->nsid_lock);
 	peer = idr_find(&net->netns_ids, id);
 	if (peer)
 		peer = maybe_get_net(peer);
-	spin_unlock_bh(&net->nsid_lock);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return peer;

Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] net: Fix possible race in peernet2id_alloc()

From: Eric W. Biederman <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-29 18:19:10

Kirill Tkhai [off-list ref] writes:
peernet2id_alloc() is racy without rtnl_lock() as atomic_read(&peer->count)
under net->nsid_lock does not guarantee, peer is alive:

rcu_read_lock()
peernet2id_alloc()                            ..
  spin_lock_bh(&net->nsid_lock)               ..
  atomic_read(&peer->count) == 1              ..
  ..                                          put_net()
  ..                                            cleanup_net()
  ..                                              for_each_net(tmp)
  ..                                                spin_lock_bh(&tmp->nsid_lock)
  ..                                                __peernet2id(tmp, net) == -1
  ..                                                    ..
  ..                                                    ..
    __peernet2id_alloc(alloc == true)                   ..
  ..                                                    ..
rcu_read_unlock()                                       ..
..                                                synchronize_rcu()
..                                                kmem_cache_free(net)

After the above situation, net::netns_id contains id pointing to freed memory,
and any other dereferencing by the id will operate with this freed memory.

Currently, peernet2id_alloc() is used under rtnl_lock() everywhere except
ovs_vport_cmd_fill_info(), and this race can't occur. But peernet2id_alloc()
is generic interface, and better we fix it before someone really starts
use it in wrong context.
Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" [off-list ref]

I have already made a clear objection to the first unnecessary and
confusing hunk.  Simply resending the muddle headed code doesn't make it
better.

Eric

quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <redacted>
---
 net/core/net_namespace.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index 60a71be75aea..6a4eab438221 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -221,17 +221,32 @@ static void rtnl_net_notifyid(struct net *net, int cmd, int id);
  */
 int peernet2id_alloc(struct net *net, struct net *peer)
 {
-	bool alloc;
+	bool alloc = false, alive = false;
 	int id;
 
-	if (atomic_read(&net->count) == 0)
-		return NETNSA_NSID_NOT_ASSIGNED;
 	spin_lock_bh(&net->nsid_lock);
-	alloc = atomic_read(&peer->count) == 0 ? false : true;
+	/* Spinlock guarantees we never hash a peer to net->netns_ids
+	 * after idr_destroy(&net->netns_ids) occurs in cleanup_net().
+	 */
+	if (atomic_read(&net->count) == 0) {
+		id = NETNSA_NSID_NOT_ASSIGNED;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * When peer is obtained from RCU lists, we may race with
+	 * its cleanup. Check whether it's alive, and this guarantees
+	 * we never hash a peer back to net->netns_ids, after it has
+	 * just been idr_remove()'d from there in cleanup_net().
+	 */
+	if (maybe_get_net(peer))
+		alive = alloc = true;
 	id = __peernet2id_alloc(net, peer, &alloc);
+unlock:
 	spin_unlock_bh(&net->nsid_lock);
 	if (alloc && id >= 0)
 		rtnl_net_notifyid(net, RTM_NEWNSID, id);
+	if (alive)
+		put_net(peer);
 	return id;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(peernet2id_alloc);

Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] net: Fix possible race in peernet2id_alloc()

From: Kirill Tkhai <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-30 18:04:56

On 29.12.2017 21:18, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Kirill Tkhai [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
peernet2id_alloc() is racy without rtnl_lock() as atomic_read(&peer->count)
under net->nsid_lock does not guarantee, peer is alive:

rcu_read_lock()
peernet2id_alloc()                            ..
  spin_lock_bh(&net->nsid_lock)               ..
  atomic_read(&peer->count) == 1              ..
  ..                                          put_net()
  ..                                            cleanup_net()
  ..                                              for_each_net(tmp)
  ..                                                spin_lock_bh(&tmp->nsid_lock)
  ..                                                __peernet2id(tmp, net) == -1
  ..                                                    ..
  ..                                                    ..
    __peernet2id_alloc(alloc == true)                   ..
  ..                                                    ..
rcu_read_unlock()                                       ..
..                                                synchronize_rcu()
..                                                kmem_cache_free(net)

After the above situation, net::netns_id contains id pointing to freed memory,
and any other dereferencing by the id will operate with this freed memory.

Currently, peernet2id_alloc() is used under rtnl_lock() everywhere except
ovs_vport_cmd_fill_info(), and this race can't occur. But peernet2id_alloc()
is generic interface, and better we fix it before someone really starts
use it in wrong context.
Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" [off-list ref]

I have already made a clear objection to the first unnecessary and
confusing hunk.  Simply resending the muddle headed code doesn't make it
better.
You provided comments on my changes and you asked couple of questions. I replied
your questions and explained, why it seems important to made the first hunk. Since
there were questions from you I interpreted the conversation is a discussion. Later
there was no an answer from you, and patchset status became not clear for me, and I
wrote about that. I had no an aim to disappoint you or ignore your position.

Thank you for the reply. Now the position is clear for me. I'll remove the first
hunk and resend the changed patchset like you suggested.

Kirill
quoted
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <redacted>
---
 net/core/net_namespace.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index 60a71be75aea..6a4eab438221 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -221,17 +221,32 @@ static void rtnl_net_notifyid(struct net *net, int cmd, int id);
  */
 int peernet2id_alloc(struct net *net, struct net *peer)
 {
-	bool alloc;
+	bool alloc = false, alive = false;
 	int id;
 
-	if (atomic_read(&net->count) == 0)
-		return NETNSA_NSID_NOT_ASSIGNED;
 	spin_lock_bh(&net->nsid_lock);
-	alloc = atomic_read(&peer->count) == 0 ? false : true;
+	/* Spinlock guarantees we never hash a peer to net->netns_ids
+	 * after idr_destroy(&net->netns_ids) occurs in cleanup_net().
+	 */
+	if (atomic_read(&net->count) == 0) {
+		id = NETNSA_NSID_NOT_ASSIGNED;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * When peer is obtained from RCU lists, we may race with
+	 * its cleanup. Check whether it's alive, and this guarantees
+	 * we never hash a peer back to net->netns_ids, after it has
+	 * just been idr_remove()'d from there in cleanup_net().
+	 */
+	if (maybe_get_net(peer))
+		alive = alloc = true;
 	id = __peernet2id_alloc(net, peer, &alloc);
+unlock:
 	spin_unlock_bh(&net->nsid_lock);
 	if (alloc && id >= 0)
 		rtnl_net_notifyid(net, RTM_NEWNSID, id);
+	if (alive)
+		put_net(peer);
 	return id;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(peernet2id_alloc);
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help