Re: [pull request][for-next V2 00/11] Mellanox, mlx5 E-Switch updates 2017-12-19

From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 15:45:36 +0200

Hi Dave and Doug,

==============
This series includes updates for mlx5 E-Switch infrastructures,
to be merged into net-next and rdma-next trees.

Mark's patches provide E-Switch refactoring that generalize the mlx5
E-Switch vf representors interfaces and data structures. The serious is
mainly focused on moving ethernet (netdev) specific representors logic out
of E-Switch (eswitch.c) into mlx5e representor module (en_rep.c), which
provides better separation and allows future support for other types of vf
representors (e.g. RDMA).

Gal's patches at the end of this serious, provide a simple syntax fix and
two other patches that handles vport ingress/egress ACL steering name
spaces to be aligned with the Firmware/Hardware specs.
===============

V1->V2:
 - Addressed coding style comments in patches #1 and #7
 - The series is still based on rc4, as now I see net-next is also @rc4.

Please pull and let me know if there's any problem.

Pulled, thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 17:01:22 -0500 (EST)

Pulled, thank you.

Actually, I had to revert.  Please fix this and resubmit:

drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c: In function ‘esw_offloads_load_reps’:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c:774:2: warning: this ‘for’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
  for (rep_type = 0; rep_type < NUM_REP_TYPES; rep_type++)
  ^~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c:776:3: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the ‘for’
   if (err)
   ^~