[PATCH] rds: Fix inaccurate accounting of unsignaled wrs

Subsystems: networking [general], rds - reliable datagram sockets, the rest

STALE3209d

3 messages, 3 authors, 2017-10-26 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] rds: Fix inaccurate accounting of unsignaled wrs

From: Håkon Bugge <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-24 14:16:52

The number of unsignaled work-requests posted to the IB send queue is
tracked by a counter in the rds_ib_connection struct. When it reaches
zero, or the caller explicitly asks for it, the send-signaled bit is
set in send_flags and the counter is reset. This is performed by the
rds_ib_set_wr_signal_state() function.

However, this function is not always used which yields inaccurate
accounting. This commit fixes this, re-factors a code bloat related to
the matter, and makes the actual parameter type to the function
consistent.

Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <redacted>
---
 net/rds/ib_send.c | 15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rds/ib_send.c b/net/rds/ib_send.c
index 6ab39db..d07ecb0 100644
--- a/net/rds/ib_send.c
+++ b/net/rds/ib_send.c
@@ -661,13 +661,15 @@ int rds_ib_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
 			}
 		}
 
-		rds_ib_set_wr_signal_state(ic, send, 0);
+		rds_ib_set_wr_signal_state(ic, send, false);
 
 		/*
 		 * Always signal the last one if we're stopping due to flow control.
 		 */
-		if (ic->i_flowctl && flow_controlled && i == (work_alloc-1))
-			send->s_wr.send_flags |= IB_SEND_SIGNALED | IB_SEND_SOLICITED;
+		if (ic->i_flowctl && flow_controlled && i == (work_alloc - 1)) {
+			rds_ib_set_wr_signal_state(ic, send, true);
+			send->s_wr.send_flags |= IB_SEND_SOLICITED;
+		}
 
 		if (send->s_wr.send_flags & IB_SEND_SIGNALED)
 			nr_sig++;
@@ -705,11 +707,8 @@ int rds_ib_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
 	if (scat == &rm->data.op_sg[rm->data.op_count]) {
 		prev->s_op = ic->i_data_op;
 		prev->s_wr.send_flags |= IB_SEND_SOLICITED;
-		if (!(prev->s_wr.send_flags & IB_SEND_SIGNALED)) {
-			ic->i_unsignaled_wrs = rds_ib_sysctl_max_unsig_wrs;
-			prev->s_wr.send_flags |= IB_SEND_SIGNALED;
-			nr_sig++;
-		}
+		if (!(prev->s_wr.send_flags & IB_SEND_SIGNALED))
+			nr_sig += rds_ib_set_wr_signal_state(ic, prev, true);
 		ic->i_data_op = NULL;
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [PATCH] rds: Fix inaccurate accounting of unsignaled wrs

From: Santosh Shilimkar <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-24 16:05:26

On 10/24/2017 7:16 AM, Håkon Bugge wrote:
The number of unsignaled work-requests posted to the IB send queue is
tracked by a counter in the rds_ib_connection struct. When it reaches
zero, or the caller explicitly asks for it, the send-signaled bit is
set in send_flags and the counter is reset. This is performed by the
rds_ib_set_wr_signal_state() function.

However, this function is not always used which yields inaccurate
accounting. This commit fixes this, re-factors a code bloat related to
the matter, and makes the actual parameter type to the function
consistent.

Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <redacted>
---
Instead of partially doing changes inside/outside helper,
can also add inline helper for solicited state like
rds_ib_set_wr_solicited_state() and use that along
with this change.

Regards,
Santosh

Re: [PATCH] rds: Fix inaccurate accounting of unsignaled wrs

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2017-10-26 08:36:35

From: Håkon Bugge <redacted>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 16:16:28 +0200
The number of unsignaled work-requests posted to the IB send queue is
tracked by a counter in the rds_ib_connection struct. When it reaches
zero, or the caller explicitly asks for it, the send-signaled bit is
set in send_flags and the counter is reset. This is performed by the
rds_ib_set_wr_signal_state() function.

However, this function is not always used which yields inaccurate
accounting. This commit fixes this, re-factors a code bloat related to
the matter, and makes the actual parameter type to the function
consistent.

Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <redacted>
Applied.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help