[PATCH] net: rxrpc: call_object: use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG

DORMANTno replies

From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden>
Date: 2017-10-23 18:13:43
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: networking [general], rxrpc sockets (af_rxrpc), the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, David Howells, Marc Dionne, Linus Torvalds

Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG in rxrpc_release_call.

This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>
---
 net/rxrpc/call_object.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
index fcdd655..b4b1a63 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_object.c
@@ -457,8 +457,7 @@ void rxrpc_release_call(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct rxrpc_call *call)
 	ASSERTCMP(call->state, ==, RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE);
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&call->lock);
-	if (test_and_set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_RELEASED, &call->flags))
-		BUG();
+	BUG_ON(test_and_set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_RELEASED, &call->flags));
 	spin_unlock_bh(&call->lock);
 
 	del_timer_sync(&call->timer);
-- 
2.7.4
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help