From: Colin King <hidden> Date: 2017-09-23 16:57:40
From: Colin Ian King <redacted>
Currently p->phy is being null checked in several places to avoid
null pointer dereferences on p->phy, however, the final call
to phy_attached_info on p->phy when p->phy will perform a null
pointer dereference. Fix this by simply moving the call into
the previous code block that is only executed if p->phy is
not null.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1457034 ("Dereference after null check")
Fixes: 2220943a21e2 ("phy: Centralise print about attached phy")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <redacted>
---
net/dsa/slave.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Date: 2017-09-23 17:13:12
On Sat, 2017-09-23 at 17:57 +0100, Colin King wrote:
quoted hunk
From: Colin Ian King <redacted>
Currently p->phy is being null checked in several places to avoid
null pointer dereferences on p->phy, however, the final call
to phy_attached_info on p->phy when p->phy will perform a null
pointer dereference. Fix this by simply moving the call into
the previous code block that is only executed if p->phy is
not null.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1457034 ("Dereference after null check")
Fixes: 2220943a21e2 ("phy: Centralise print about attached phy")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <redacted>
---
net/dsa/slave.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -1115,10 +1115,9 @@ static int dsa_slave_phy_setup(struct net_device *slave_dev)of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(port_dn);returnret;}+phy_attached_info(p->phy);}-phy_attached_info(p->phy);-return0;}
Huh? Why move this into the test?
The test of the block above this change is
if (!p->phy) {
Perhaps this should be
'
if (p->phy)
phy_attached_info(p->phy);
or simpler
} else {
phy_attached_info(p->phy);
}
or maybe reverse the block
if (p->phy) {
phy_attached_info(p->phy);
} else {
ret = dsa_slave_phy_connect(slave_dev, p->dp->index);
if (ret) {
netdev_err(slave_dev, "failed to connect to port %d: %d\n",
p->dp->index, ret);
if (phy_is_fixed)
of_phy_deregister_fixed_link(port_dn);
return ret;
}
}
return 0;
}
From: Colin Ian King <redacted>
Currently p->phy is being null checked in several places to avoid
null pointer dereferences on p->phy, however, the final call
to phy_attached_info on p->phy when p->phy will perform a null
pointer dereference. Fix this by simply moving the call into
the previous code block that is only executed if p->phy is
not null.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1457034 ("Dereference after null check")
The code flow is not exactly easy to read, but I don't see how we can
actually wind up in that situation because we check the return values of
of_phy_connect() and dsa_slave_phy_connect() earlier on.
quoted hunk
Fixes: 2220943a21e2 ("phy: Centralise print about attached phy")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <redacted>
---
net/dsa/slave.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)