txq_reclaim() does the normal transmit queue reclamation and
rxq_deinit() does the RX ring cleanup, none of these are packet drops,
so use dev_consume_skb() for both locations.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ static int txq_reclaim(struct tx_queue *txq, int budget, int force)structsk_buff*skb=__skb_dequeue(&txq->tx_skb);if(!WARN_ON(!skb))-dev_kfree_skb(skb);+dev_consume_skb_any(skb);}if(cmd_sts&ERROR_SUMMARY){
txq_reclaim() does the normal transmit queue reclamation and
rxq_deinit() does the RX ring cleanup, none of these are packet drops,
so use dev_consume_skb() for both locations.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden> Date: 2017-08-25 04:35:03
On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 20:55 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted hunk
txq_reclaim() does the normal transmit queue reclamation and
rxq_deinit() does the RX ring cleanup, none of these are packet drops,
so use dev_consume_skb() for both locations.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ static int txq_reclaim(struct tx_queue *txq, int budget, int force)structsk_buff*skb=__skb_dequeue(&txq->tx_skb);if(!WARN_ON(!skb))-dev_kfree_skb(skb);+dev_consume_skb_any(skb);}if(cmd_sts&ERROR_SUMMARY){
On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 20:55 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted
txq_reclaim() does the normal transmit queue reclamation and
rxq_deinit() does the RX ring cleanup, none of these are packet drops,
so use dev_consume_skb() for both locations.
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ static int txq_reclaim(struct tx_queue *txq, int budget, int force)structsk_buff*skb=__skb_dequeue(&txq->tx_skb);if(!WARN_ON(!skb))-dev_kfree_skb(skb);+dev_consume_skb_any(skb);}if(cmd_sts&ERROR_SUMMARY){
I do not believe this patch is needed.
dev_kfree_skb() is an alias of consume_skb(), which is already drop
monitor ready ;)
You are right, this patch is/was not needed, I have been too trigger
happy with the dev_kfree_skb*() replacement, but only
dev_kfree_skb_{any,irq} are valid candidates for replacement by
dev_consume_skb_{any,irq}. I will re-audit my other two submissions to
e1000e and r8169. Thanks Eric.
--
Florian