# \[net-next PATCH 5/9\] bpf: more SK\_SKB selftests - From: John Fastabend \ - Date: 2017-08-28 14:11:37 - List: netdev - Page: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2017/08/11064342 - Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/netdev/2017/08/11064337/t.md ```text Tests packet read/writes and additional skb fields. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 353d170..8eb0995 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -1119,6 +1119,104 @@ struct test_val { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, }, { + "invalid access of tc_classid for SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + }, + { + "check skb->mark is writeable by SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "check skb->tc_index is writeable by SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "check skb->priority is writeable by SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, priority)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "direct packet read for SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "direct packet write for SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { + "overlapping checks for direct packet access SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 4), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 6), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 6), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + }, + { "check skb->mark is not writeable by sockets", .insns = { BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, ```