[PATCH net] tcp: fix possible deadlock in TCP stack vs BPF filter
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-15 00:44:45
From: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Filtering the ACK packet was not put at the right place.
At this place, we already allocated a child and put it
into accept queue.
We absolutely need to call tcp_child_process() to release
its spinlock, or we will deadlock at accept() or close() time.
Found by syzkaller team (Thanks a lot !)
Fixes: 8fac365f63c8 ("tcp: Add a tcp_filter hook before handle ack packet")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Chenbo Feng <redacted>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 4 ++--
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index a20e7f03d5f7..e9252c7df809 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c@@ -1722,6 +1722,8 @@ int tcp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) */ sock_hold(sk); refcounted = true; + if (tcp_filter(sk, skb)) + goto discard_and_relse; nsk = tcp_check_req(sk, skb, req, false); if (!nsk) { reqsk_put(req);
@@ -1729,8 +1731,6 @@ int tcp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) } if (nsk == sk) { reqsk_put(req); - } else if (tcp_filter(sk, skb)) { - goto discard_and_relse; } else if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) { tcp_v4_send_reset(nsk, skb); goto discard_and_relse;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index 2521690d62d6..206210125fd7 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c@@ -1456,6 +1456,8 @@ static int tcp_v6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) } sock_hold(sk); refcounted = true; + if (tcp_filter(sk, skb)) + goto discard_and_relse; nsk = tcp_check_req(sk, skb, req, false); if (!nsk) { reqsk_put(req);
@@ -1464,8 +1466,6 @@ static int tcp_v6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) if (nsk == sk) { reqsk_put(req); tcp_v6_restore_cb(skb); - } else if (tcp_filter(sk, skb)) { - goto discard_and_relse; } else if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) { tcp_v6_send_reset(nsk, skb); goto discard_and_relse;