Re: [PATCH 07/11] wireless: ipw2x00: convert to use DRIVER_ATTR_RW

2 messages, 2 authors, 2017-06-09 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 07/11] wireless: ipw2x00: convert to use DRIVER_ATTR_RW

From: Kalle Valo <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-09 09:25:52

Greg Kroah-Hartman [off-list ref] writes:
We are trying to get rid of DRIVER_ATTR(), and the ipw2x00 driver's
attributes can be trivially changed to use DRIVER_ATTR_RW().

Cc: Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@gmail.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Looks good to me. I assume that I should take this, but let me know if
you are planning to push this via your trees instead. Either way is fine
for me, I'm not expecting any conflicts here.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Re: [PATCH 07/11] wireless: ipw2x00: convert to use DRIVER_ATTR_RW

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2017-06-09 09:34:46

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 12:25:44PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
Greg Kroah-Hartman [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
We are trying to get rid of DRIVER_ATTR(), and the ipw2x00 driver's
attributes can be trivially changed to use DRIVER_ATTR_RW().

Cc: Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@gmail.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Looks good to me. I assume that I should take this, but let me know if
you are planning to push this via your trees instead. Either way is fine
for me, I'm not expecting any conflicts here.
I can take it, thanks!

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help