[PATCH] loopback: Force LOOPBACK_IFINDEX for registration

Subsystems: networking drivers, the rest

STALE3405d

6 messages, 3 authors, 2017-06-21 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] loopback: Force LOOPBACK_IFINDEX for registration

From: Serhey Popovych <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-16 12:10:18

Now with commit 9c7dafb (net: Allow to create links with
given ifindex) support registration of network devices
with specific ifindex is added.

We can force loopback network device index before call to
register_netdev() to ensure we always configure it with
LOOPBACK_IFINDEX.

Kill BUG_ON() since system can continue without network
namespace failed in loopback init path, unless it is
init_net namespace where we panic() anyway.

Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/loopback.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/loopback.c b/drivers/net/loopback.c
index 3061249..d7233aa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/loopback.c
+++ b/drivers/net/loopback.c
@@ -210,12 +210,13 @@ static __net_init int loopback_net_init(struct net *net)
 	if (!dev)
 		goto out;
 
+	dev->ifindex = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX;
+
 	dev_net_set(dev, net);
 	err = register_netdev(dev);
 	if (err)
 		goto out_free_netdev;
 
-	BUG_ON(dev->ifindex != LOOPBACK_IFINDEX);
 	net->loopback_dev = dev;
 	return 0;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [PATCH] loopback: Force LOOPBACK_IFINDEX for registration

From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-17 11:21:39

Hello!

On 6/16/2017 3:10 PM, Serhey Popovych wrote:
Now with commit 9c7dafb (net: Allow to create links with
   The commit citing style is standardized: 12-digit SHA1 and the summary enclosed in ("").
given ifindex) support registration of network devices
   Support for.
with specific ifindex is added.
   Was added.
We can force loopback network device index before call to
register_netdev() to ensure we always configure it with
LOOPBACK_IFINDEX.

Kill BUG_ON() since system can continue without network
namespace failed in loopback init path, unless it is
init_net namespace where we panic() anyway.

Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <redacted>
[...]

MBR, Sergei

Re: [PATCH] loopback: Force LOOPBACK_IFINDEX for registration

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2017-06-19 18:41:25

From: Serhey Popovych <redacted>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:10:03 +0300
Now with commit 9c7dafb (net: Allow to create links with
given ifindex) support registration of network devices
with specific ifindex is added.

We can force loopback network device index before call to
register_netdev() to ensure we always configure it with
LOOPBACK_IFINDEX.

Kill BUG_ON() since system can continue without network
namespace failed in loopback init path, unless it is
init_net namespace where we panic() anyway.

Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <redacted>
Is the BUG_ON() triggering, if so why?

It looks to me that unless there is a bug, this assignment
is unnecessary.

Re: [PATCH] loopback: Force LOOPBACK_IFINDEX for registration

From: Serhey Popovych <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-20 10:32:23

From: Serhey Popovych <redacted>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:10:03 +0300
quoted
Now with commit 9c7dafb (net: Allow to create links with
given ifindex) support registration of network devices
with specific ifindex is added.

We can force loopback network device index before call to
register_netdev() to ensure we always configure it with
LOOPBACK_IFINDEX.

Kill BUG_ON() since system can continue without network
namespace failed in loopback init path, unless it is
init_net namespace where we panic() anyway.

Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <redacted>
Is the BUG_ON() triggering, if so why?

It looks to me that unless there is a bug, this assignment
is unnecessary.
Okay, get your position, thanks!

-- 
Thanks, Serhey

Re: [PATCH] loopback: Force LOOPBACK_IFINDEX for registration

From: Serhey Popovych <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-21 09:35:16

quoted
From: Serhey Popovych <redacted>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:10:03 +0300
quoted
Now with commit 9c7dafb (net: Allow to create links with
given ifindex) support registration of network devices
with specific ifindex is added.

We can force loopback network device index before call to
register_netdev() to ensure we always configure it with
LOOPBACK_IFINDEX.

Kill BUG_ON() since system can continue without network
namespace failed in loopback init path, unless it is
init_net namespace where we panic() anyway.

Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <redacted>
Is the BUG_ON() triggering, if so why?

It looks to me that unless there is a bug, this assignment
is unnecessary.
Okay, get your position, thanks!
Sorry for raising again, but my objectives following:

BUG_ON() might be compiled out when CONFIG_BUG=n.
That's open possibility in buggy setups to have
"lo" with ->ifindex other than LOOPBACK_IFINDEX.

By forcing register_netdevice() via setting
ifindex = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX we address CONFIG_BUG=n
case.

We can leave BUG_ON(), but add ifindex = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX
to ensure register_netdevice() operates properly.

What do you think?

-- 
Thanks, Serhey

Re: [PATCH] loopback: Force LOOPBACK_IFINDEX for registration

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2017-06-21 16:20:48

From: Serhey Popovych <redacted>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:35:12 +0300
quoted
quoted
From: Serhey Popovych <redacted>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:10:03 +0300
quoted
Now with commit 9c7dafb (net: Allow to create links with
given ifindex) support registration of network devices
with specific ifindex is added.

We can force loopback network device index before call to
register_netdev() to ensure we always configure it with
LOOPBACK_IFINDEX.

Kill BUG_ON() since system can continue without network
namespace failed in loopback init path, unless it is
init_net namespace where we panic() anyway.

Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <redacted>
Is the BUG_ON() triggering, if so why?

It looks to me that unless there is a bug, this assignment
is unnecessary.
Okay, get your position, thanks!
Sorry for raising again, but my objectives following:

BUG_ON() might be compiled out when CONFIG_BUG=n.
That's open possibility in buggy setups to have
"lo" with ->ifindex other than LOOPBACK_IFINDEX.

By forcing register_netdevice() via setting
ifindex = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX we address CONFIG_BUG=n
case.

We can leave BUG_ON(), but add ifindex = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX
to ensure register_netdevice() operates properly.

What do you think?
I don't understand what you are trying to achieve.

BUG_ON() is an assertion.

It checks that an invariant holds.

Whether the check is enabled or not has no bearing on the
invariant.

There is no reason to make the assignment if it is supposed
to be set properly already, period.  The assertion states
that it is supposed to be set properly when we get to this
code.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help