[PATCH] net: ipv6: Removed unnecessary parenthesis

Subsystems: networking [general], the rest

STALE3442d

2 messages, 2 authors, 2017-04-07 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] net: ipv6: Removed unnecessary parenthesis

From: Arushi Singhal <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-29 09:02:52

Removed parentheses on the right hand side of assignment, as they are
not required. The following coccinelle script was used to fix this
issue:

@@
local idexpression id;
expression e;
@@

id =
-(
e
-)

Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <redacted>
---
 net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
index fdde76e8a16a..34dfdc2fb2bc 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
@@ -387,9 +387,9 @@ nf_ct_frag6_reasm(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *prev,  struct net_devic
 		return false;
 
 	/* Unfragmented part is taken from the first segment. */
-	payload_len = ((head->data - skb_network_header(head)) -
+	payload_len = (head->data - skb_network_header(head)) -
 		       sizeof(struct ipv6hdr) + fq->q.len -
-		       sizeof(struct frag_hdr));
+		       sizeof(struct frag_hdr);
 	if (payload_len > IPV6_MAXPLEN) {
 		net_dbg_ratelimited("nf_ct_frag6_reasm: payload len = %d\n",
 				    payload_len);
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH] net: ipv6: Removed unnecessary parenthesis

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: 2017-04-07 16:32:13

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 02:32:43PM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
Removed parentheses on the right hand side of assignment, as they are
not required. The following coccinelle script was used to fix this
issue:

@@
local idexpression id;
expression e;
@@

id =
-(
e
-)
You sent me two patches for this:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/744661/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/744702/

The follow up one does not indicate v2, so I'm confused. I'm not sure
this is a resend or just a new version.

Another question that is not clear from your description is if you had
a look at the entire tree to find more spots like this, or you just
found this one and update it.

Ideally, it would be better to fix everything in one go, so we don't
have to deal with oneliner patches that just fix one single spot.

Thanks!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help