[patch net-next] spectrum: acl_tcam: Fix catchall prio value

From: Jiri Pirko <redacted>

This fixes an issue reported by smatch:
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_chunk_create() warn: impossible condition '(priority == (-1)) => (0-u32max == u64max)'

Reported-by: Or Gerlitz <redacted>
Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
Fixes: 22a677661f56 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Introduce ACL core with simple TCAM implementation")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
Acked-by: Ido Schimmel <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c
index a0a968e..1ec3dd0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c

@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_entry_remove(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
 	mlxsw_reg_write(mlxsw_sp->core, MLXSW_REG(ptce2), ptce2_pl);
 }
 
-#define MLXSW_SP_ACL_TCAM_CATCHALL_PRIO (-1UL)
+#define MLXSW_SP_ACL_TCAM_CATCHALL_PRIO (-1U)
 
 static int
 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_region_catchall_add(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,

-- 
2.7.4

From: Jiri Pirko

Sent: 07 February 2017 14:27
From: Jiri Pirko <redacted>

This fixes an issue reported by smatch:
mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_chunk_create() warn: impossible condition '(priority == (-1)) => (0-u32max ==
u64max)'

...

Either (-1) or (~0u) is probably better.

	David