[PATCH net] sctp: avoid BUG_ON on sctp_wait_for_sndbuf

Subsystems: networking [general], sctp protocol, the rest

STALE3482d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)

1 review trailer.

3 messages, 3 authors, 2017-02-07 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH net] sctp: avoid BUG_ON on sctp_wait_for_sndbuf

From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-02-06 20:10:56

Alexander Popov reported that an application may trigger a BUG_ON in
sctp_wait_for_sndbuf if the socket tx buffer is full, a thread is
waiting on it to queue more data and meanwhile another thread peels off
the association being used by the first thread.

This patch replaces the BUG_ON call with a proper error handling. It
will return -EPIPE to the original sendmsg call, similarly to what would
have been done if the association wasn't found in the first place.

Acked-by: Alexander Popov <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
---
Please consider this to -stable. Thanks

 net/sctp/socket.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 37eeab7899fc235a56bd2f4ccdb3e6c338a8d48e..e214d2e7e9a30c02847daf354668c42eeaffd0d6 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -7426,7 +7426,8 @@ static int sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(struct sctp_association *asoc, long *timeo_p,
 		 */
 		release_sock(sk);
 		current_timeo = schedule_timeout(current_timeo);
-		BUG_ON(sk != asoc->base.sk);
+		if (sk != asoc->base.sk)
+			goto do_error;
 		lock_sock(sk);
 
 		*timeo_p = current_timeo;
-- 
2.9.3

Re: [PATCH net] sctp: avoid BUG_ON on sctp_wait_for_sndbuf

From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-02-07 13:02:48

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
[off-list ref] wrote:
Alexander Popov reported that an application may trigger a BUG_ON in
sctp_wait_for_sndbuf if the socket tx buffer is full, a thread is
waiting on it to queue more data and meanwhile another thread peels off
the association being used by the first thread.

This patch replaces the BUG_ON call with a proper error handling. It
will return -EPIPE to the original sendmsg call, similarly to what would
have been done if the association wasn't found in the first place.

Acked-by: Alexander Popov <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
---
Please consider this to -stable. Thanks
Reviewed-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
quoted hunk
 net/sctp/socket.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 37eeab7899fc235a56bd2f4ccdb3e6c338a8d48e..e214d2e7e9a30c02847daf354668c42eeaffd0d6 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -7426,7 +7426,8 @@ static int sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(struct sctp_association *asoc, long *timeo_p,
                 */
                release_sock(sk);
                current_timeo = schedule_timeout(current_timeo);
-               BUG_ON(sk != asoc->base.sk);
+               if (sk != asoc->base.sk)
+                       goto do_error;
                lock_sock(sk);

                *timeo_p = current_timeo;
--
2.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH net] sctp: avoid BUG_ON on sctp_wait_for_sndbuf

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2017-02-07 17:55:56

From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  6 Feb 2017 18:10:31 -0200
Alexander Popov reported that an application may trigger a BUG_ON in
sctp_wait_for_sndbuf if the socket tx buffer is full, a thread is
waiting on it to queue more data and meanwhile another thread peels off
the association being used by the first thread.

This patch replaces the BUG_ON call with a proper error handling. It
will return -EPIPE to the original sendmsg call, similarly to what would
have been done if the association wasn't found in the first place.

Acked-by: Alexander Popov <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
---
Please consider this to -stable. Thanks
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks a lot.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help