[PATCH net-next v5 0/1] Add support for tc cookies

STALE3496d

Revision v5 of 3 in this series.

7 messages, 3 authors, 2017-01-22 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH net-next v5 0/1] Add support for tc cookies

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Date: 2017-01-22 13:00:12

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>

Changes in V5:
 - kill the stylistic changes
 - Adopt a new structure with length-valuepointer representation
 - rename some things

Changes in v4:
 - move stylistic changes out into a separate patch
   (and add more stylistic changes)

Changes in v3:
 - use TC_ prefix for the max size
 - move the cookie struct so visible only to kernel
 - remove unneeded void * cast

Changes in V2:
 -move from a union to a length-value representation

Jamal Hadi Salim (1):
  net sched actions: Add support for user cookies

 include/net/act_api.h        |  1 +
 include/net/pkt_cls.h        |  8 ++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h |  3 +++
 net/sched/act_api.c          | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+)

-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH net-next v5 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for user cookies

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Date: 2017-01-22 13:00:35

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>

Introduce optional 128-bit action cookie.
Like all other cookie schemes in the networking world (eg in protocols
like http or existing kernel fib protocol field, etc) the idea is to save
user state that when retrieved serves as a correlator. The kernel
_should not_ intepret it.  The user can store whatever they wish in the
128 bits.

Sample exercise(showing variable length use of cookie)

.. create an accept action with cookie a1b2c3d4
sudo $TC actions add action ok index 1 cookie a1b2c3d4

.. dump all gact actions..
sudo $TC -s actions ls action gact

    action order 0: gact action pass
     random type none pass val 0
     index 1 ref 1 bind 0 installed 5 sec used 5 sec
    Action statistics:
    Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
    backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
    cookie a1b2c3d4

.. bind the accept action to a filter..
sudo $TC filter add dev lo parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 \
u32 match ip dst 127.0.0.1/32 flowid 1:1 action gact index 1

... send some traffic..
$ ping 127.0.0.1 -c 3
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.027 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.038 ms
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2109ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.020/0.028/0.038/0.008 ms 1

... show some stats
$ sudo $TC -s actions get action gact index 1

    action order 1: gact action pass
     random type none pass val 0
     index 1 ref 2 bind 1 installed 204 sec used 5 sec
    Action statistics:
        Sent 12168 bytes 164 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
    backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
    cookie a1b2c3d4

.. try longer cookie...
$ sudo $TC actions replace action ok index 1 cookie 1234567890abcdef
.. dump..
$ sudo $TC -s actions ls action gact

    action order 1: gact action pass
     random type none pass val 0
     index 1 ref 2 bind 1 installed 204 sec used 5 sec
    Action statistics:
        Sent 12168 bytes 164 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
    backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
    cookie 1234567890abcdef

Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
---
 include/net/act_api.h        |  1 +
 include/net/pkt_cls.h        |  8 ++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h |  3 +++
 net/sched/act_api.c          | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/net/act_api.h b/include/net/act_api.h
index 1d71644..cfa2ae3 100644
--- a/include/net/act_api.h
+++ b/include/net/act_api.h
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct tc_action {
 	struct rcu_head			tcfa_rcu;
 	struct gnet_stats_basic_cpu __percpu *cpu_bstats;
 	struct gnet_stats_queue __percpu *cpu_qstats;
+	struct tc_cookie	*act_cookie;
 };
 #define tcf_head	common.tcfa_head
 #define tcf_index	common.tcfa_index
diff --git a/include/net/pkt_cls.h b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
index f0a0514..b43077e 100644
--- a/include/net/pkt_cls.h
+++ b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
@@ -515,4 +515,12 @@ struct tc_cls_bpf_offload {
 	u32 gen_flags;
 };
 
+
+/* This structure holds cookie structure that is passed from user
+ * to the kernel for actions and classifiers
+ */
+struct tc_cookie {
+	u8  *data;
+	u32 len;
+};
 #endif
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
index fd373eb..345551e 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/pkt_sched.h>
 
+#define TC_COOKIE_MAX_SIZE 16
+
 /* Action attributes */
 enum {
 	TCA_ACT_UNSPEC,
@@ -12,6 +14,7 @@ enum {
 	TCA_ACT_INDEX,
 	TCA_ACT_STATS,
 	TCA_ACT_PAD,
+	TCA_ACT_COOKIE,
 	__TCA_ACT_MAX
 };
 
diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
index cd08df9..84052630 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <net/net_namespace.h>
 #include <net/sock.h>
 #include <net/sch_generic.h>
+#include <net/pkt_cls.h>
 #include <net/act_api.h>
 #include <net/netlink.h>
 
@@ -33,6 +34,8 @@ static void free_tcf(struct rcu_head *head)
 
 	free_percpu(p->cpu_bstats);
 	free_percpu(p->cpu_qstats);
+	kfree(p->act_cookie->data);
+	kfree(p->act_cookie);
 	kfree(p);
 }
 
@@ -475,6 +478,12 @@ int tcf_action_destroy(struct list_head *actions, int bind)
 		goto nla_put_failure;
 	if (tcf_action_copy_stats(skb, a, 0))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
+	if (a->act_cookie) {
+		if (nla_put(skb, TCA_ACT_COOKIE, a->act_cookie->len,
+			    a->act_cookie->data))
+			goto nla_put_failure;
+	}
+
 	nest = nla_nest_start(skb, TCA_OPTIONS);
 	if (nest == NULL)
 		goto nla_put_failure;
@@ -575,6 +584,32 @@ struct tc_action *tcf_action_init_1(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto err_mod;
 
+	if (tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE]) {
+		int cklen = nla_len(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE]);
+
+		if (cklen > TC_COOKIE_MAX_SIZE) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			tcf_hash_release(a, bind);
+			goto err_mod;
+		}
+
+		a->act_cookie = kzalloc(sizeof(*a->act_cookie), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!a->act_cookie) {
+			err = -ENOMEM;
+			tcf_hash_release(a, bind);
+			goto err_mod;
+		}
+
+		a->act_cookie->data = nla_memdup(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE],
+						 GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!a->act_cookie->data) {
+			err = -ENOMEM;
+			tcf_hash_release(a, bind);
+			goto err_mod;
+		}
+		a->act_cookie->len = cklen;
+	}
+
 	/* module count goes up only when brand new policy is created
 	 * if it exists and is only bound to in a_o->init() then
 	 * ACT_P_CREATED is not returned (a zero is).
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/1] Add support for tc cookies

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Date: 2017-01-22 13:01:59

I removed people's reviewed/Acked because i changed the data structure
per Daniel's suggestions.

cheers,
jamal
On 17-01-22 07:51 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>

Changes in V5:
 - kill the stylistic changes
 - Adopt a new structure with length-valuepointer representation
 - rename some things

Changes in v4:
 - move stylistic changes out into a separate patch
   (and add more stylistic changes)

Changes in v3:
 - use TC_ prefix for the max size
 - move the cookie struct so visible only to kernel
 - remove unneeded void * cast

Changes in V2:
 -move from a union to a length-value representation

Jamal Hadi Salim (1):
  net sched actions: Add support for user cookies

 include/net/act_api.h        |  1 +
 include/net/pkt_cls.h        |  8 ++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/pkt_cls.h |  3 +++
 net/sched/act_api.c          | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+)

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for user cookies

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-01-22 18:13:34


On 01/22/2017 04:51 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
quoted hunk
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>

Introduce optional 128-bit action cookie.
Like all other cookie schemes in the networking world (eg in protocols
like http or existing kernel fib protocol field, etc) the idea is to save
user state that when retrieved serves as a correlator. The kernel
_should not_ intepret it.  The user can store whatever they wish in the
128 bits.

Sample exercise(showing variable length use of cookie)

.. create an accept action with cookie a1b2c3d4
sudo $TC actions add action ok index 1 cookie a1b2c3d4

.. dump all gact actions..
sudo $TC -s actions ls action gact

    action order 0: gact action pass
     random type none pass val 0
     index 1 ref 1 bind 0 installed 5 sec used 5 sec
    Action statistics:
    Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
    backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
    cookie a1b2c3d4

.. bind the accept action to a filter..
sudo $TC filter add dev lo parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 \
u32 match ip dst 127.0.0.1/32 flowid 1:1 action gact index 1

... send some traffic..
$ ping 127.0.0.1 -c 3
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.027 ms
64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.038 ms
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2109ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.020/0.028/0.038/0.008 ms 1

... show some stats
$ sudo $TC -s actions get action gact index 1

    action order 1: gact action pass
     random type none pass val 0
     index 1 ref 2 bind 1 installed 204 sec used 5 sec
    Action statistics:
        Sent 12168 bytes 164 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
    backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
    cookie a1b2c3d4

.. try longer cookie...
$ sudo $TC actions replace action ok index 1 cookie 1234567890abcdef
.. dump..
$ sudo $TC -s actions ls action gact

    action order 1: gact action pass
     random type none pass val 0
     index 1 ref 2 bind 1 installed 204 sec used 5 sec
    Action statistics:
        Sent 12168 bytes 164 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
    backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
    cookie 1234567890abcdef

Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
+		a->act_cookie->data = nla_memdup(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE],
+						 GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!a->act_cookie->data) {
+			err = -ENOMEM;
+			tcf_hash_release(a, bind);
+			goto err_mod;
+		}
Are not you leaking a->act_cookie here in case nla_memdup() fails here?
-- 
Florian

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for user cookies

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Date: 2017-01-22 18:57:20

On 17-01-22 01:13 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted
+		a->act_cookie->data = nla_memdup(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE],
+						 GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!a->act_cookie->data) {
+			err = -ENOMEM;
+			tcf_hash_release(a, bind);
+			goto err_mod;
+		}
Are not you leaking a->act_cookie here in case nla_memdup() fails here?
yes, I am. Thanks for catching this. V6 coming up.

cheers,
jamal

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for user cookies

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Date: 2017-01-22 19:32:41

Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 07:57:17PM CET, jhs@mojatatu.com wrote:
On 17-01-22 01:13 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+		a->act_cookie->data = nla_memdup(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE],
+						 GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!a->act_cookie->data) {
+			err = -ENOMEM;
+			tcf_hash_release(a, bind);
+			goto err_mod;
+		}
Are not you leaking a->act_cookie here in case nla_memdup() fails here?
yes, I am. Thanks for catching this. V6 coming up.
Btw, you don't have to send cover letter for a single patch. In fact, you
should not.

Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/1] net sched actions: Add support for user cookies

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Date: 2017-01-22 19:44:58

On 17-01-22 02:32 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 07:57:17PM CET, jhs@mojatatu.com wrote:
quoted
On 17-01-22 01:13 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
+		a->act_cookie->data = nla_memdup(tb[TCA_ACT_COOKIE],
+						 GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!a->act_cookie->data) {
+			err = -ENOMEM;
+			tcf_hash_release(a, bind);
+			goto err_mod;
+		}
Are not you leaking a->act_cookie here in case nla_memdup() fails here?
yes, I am. Thanks for catching this. V6 coming up.
Btw, you don't have to send cover letter for a single patch. In fact, you
should not.
You can see i write small novels in my commit logs. Do you suggest i
put the git history there as well?

cheers,
jamal
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help