Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] siphash: add cryptographically secure PRF

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 9:41 PM, George Spelvin
[off-list ref] wrote:

What are you testing on?  And what input size?  And does "33% improvement"
mean 4/3 the rate and 3/4 the time?  Or 2/3 the time and 3/2 the rate?

How that I've published my hsiphash implementation to my tree, it
should be possible to conduct the tests back to back with nearly
identical implementation strategies, to remove a potential source of
error.