Hello, John.

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:39:38PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:

So just to clarify the discussion for my purposes and make sure I
understood, per-cgroup CAP rules was not desired, and instead we
should either utilize an existing cap (are there still objections to
CAP_SYS_RESOURCE? - this isn't clear to me) or create a new one (ie,
bring back the older CAP_CGROUP_MIGRATE patch).

Let's create a new one.  It looks to be a bit too different to share
with an existing one.

Tejun: Do you have a more finished version of your patch that I should
add my changes on top of?

Oh, just submit the patch on top of the current for-next.  I can queue
mine on top of yours.  They are mostly orthogonal.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun