[PATCH 1/1] net: caif: fix ineffective error check

Subsystems: networking [general], the rest

STALE3567d

4 messages, 3 authors, 2016-12-03 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH 1/1] net: caif: fix ineffective error check

From: Pan Bian <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-03 11:34:47

In function caif_sktinit_module(), the check of the return value of
sock_register() seems ineffective. This patch fixes it.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188751

Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <redacted>
---
 net/caif/caif_socket.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/caif/caif_socket.c b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
index aa209b1..2a689a3 100644
--- a/net/caif/caif_socket.c
+++ b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
@@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ static int caif_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
 static int __init caif_sktinit_module(void)
 {
 	int err = sock_register(&caif_family_ops);
-	if (!err)
+	if (err)
 		return err;
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: caif: fix ineffective error check

From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-03 13:18:02

Hello.

On 12/3/2016 2:18 PM, Pan Bian wrote:
quoted hunk
In function caif_sktinit_module(), the check of the return value of
sock_register() seems ineffective. This patch fixes it.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188751

Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <redacted>
---
 net/caif/caif_socket.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/caif/caif_socket.c b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
index aa209b1..2a689a3 100644
--- a/net/caif/caif_socket.c
+++ b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
@@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ static int caif_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
 static int __init caif_sktinit_module(void)
 {
 	int err = sock_register(&caif_family_ops);
-	if (!err)
+	if (err)
 		return err;
    Why not just:

	return sock_register(&caif_family_ops);
 	return 0;
 }
MBR, Sergei

Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: caif: fix ineffective error check

From: Pan Bian <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-03 16:29:22

From: PanBian <redacted>

Hello Sergei,

On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 04:17:51PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.

On 12/3/2016 2:18 PM, Pan Bian wrote:
quoted
In function caif_sktinit_module(), the check of the return value of
sock_register() seems ineffective. This patch fixes it.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188751

Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <redacted>
---
net/caif/caif_socket.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/caif/caif_socket.c b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
index aa209b1..2a689a3 100644
--- a/net/caif/caif_socket.c
+++ b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
@@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ static int caif_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
static int __init caif_sktinit_module(void)
{
	int err = sock_register(&caif_family_ops);
-	if (!err)
+	if (err)
		return err;
   Why not just:

	return sock_register(&caif_family_ops);
	Your solution looks much cleaner.

	But I am not really sure whether it is the author's intention to
	return 0 anyway. Do you have any idea?

	Thanks!
quoted
	return 0;
}
MBR, Sergei
Best regards,
Pan

Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: caif: fix ineffective error check

From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-03 21:05:53

On 12/03/2016 06:38 PM, Pan Bian wrote:
quoted
quoted
In function caif_sktinit_module(), the check of the return value of
sock_register() seems ineffective. This patch fixes it.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188751

Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <redacted>
---
net/caif/caif_socket.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/caif/caif_socket.c b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
index aa209b1..2a689a3 100644
--- a/net/caif/caif_socket.c
+++ b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
@@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ static int caif_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
static int __init caif_sktinit_module(void)
{
	int err = sock_register(&caif_family_ops);
-	if (!err)
+	if (err)
		return err;
   Why not just:

	return sock_register(&caif_family_ops);
	Your solution looks much cleaner.

	But I am not really sure whether it is the author's intention to
	return 0 anyway. Do you have any idea?
    I don't think so, the error check seems to have a typo.

[...]
Best regards,
Pan
MBR, Sergei
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help