Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 2 authors, 2016-12-31

Re: [PATCH net-next] af_packet: Provide a TPACKET_V2 compatible Tx path for TPACKET_V3

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-12-30 21:34:29

On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sowmini Varadhan
[off-list ref] wrote:
Although TPACKET_V3 Rx has some benefits over TPACKET_V2 Rx,
*_v3 does not currently have Tx support. As a result an application
that wants the best perf for Tx and Rx (e.g. to handle
request/response transacations) ends up needing 2 sockets,
one with *_v2 for Tx and another with *_v3 for Rx.

This patch enables TPACKET_V2 compatible Tx features in TPACKET_V3
so that _v3 supports at least as many features as _v2.
Once we define the interface as equivalent to v2, we cannot redefine it to
support v3-only features later.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan <redacted>
---
 Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt |    6 ++++--
 net/packet/af_packet.c                   |   23 +++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt b/Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt
index daa015a..6425062 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt
+++ b/Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ where 'tpacket_version' can be TPACKET_V1 (default), TPACKET_V2, TPACKET_V3.
                   (void *)hdr + TPACKET_ALIGN(sizeof(struct tpacket_hdr))

 TPACKET_V2 --> TPACKET_V3:
-       - Flexible buffer implementation:
+       - Flexible buffer implementation for RX_RING:
                1. Blocks can be configured with non-static frame-size
This is one of the main advantages of the v3 interface, and also
relevant to Tx. The current implementation does not consult
tpacket3_hdr->tp_next_offset and would preclude adding that
later.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help