[PATCH net] bpf, test_verifier: fix a test case error result on unprivileged
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2016-12-15 00:39:21
Running ./test_verifier as unprivileged lets 1 out of 98 tests fail:
[...]
#71 unpriv: check that printk is disallowed FAIL
Unexpected error message!
0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0
1: (bf) r1 = r10
2: (07) r1 += -8
3: (b7) r2 = 8
4: (bf) r3 = r1
5: (85) call bpf_trace_printk#6
unknown func bpf_trace_printk#6
[...]
The test case is correct, just that the error outcome changed with
ebb676daa1a3 ("bpf: Print function name in addition to function id").
Same as with e00c7b216f34 ("bpf: fix multiple issues in selftest suite
and samples") issue 2), so just fix up the function name.
Fixes: ebb676daa1a3 ("bpf: Print function name in addition to function id")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 072dc63..853d7e4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c@@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@ struct test_val { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "unknown func 6", + .errstr_unpriv = "unknown func bpf_trace_printk#6", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, },
--
1.9.3