linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-main.c

between commit:

  91eefaabf102 ("amd-xgbe: Fix unused suspend handlers build warning")

from the net tree and commit:

  bd8255d8ba35 ("amd-xgbe: Prepare for supporting PCI devices")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (the latter removed the code modified by the former)
and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:22:32AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-main.c

between commit:

  91eefaabf102 ("amd-xgbe: Fix unused suspend handlers build warning")

from the net tree and commit:

  bd8255d8ba35 ("amd-xgbe: Prepare for supporting PCI devices")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (the latter removed the code modified by the former)

... except that +#ifdef CONFIG_PM is present in the new
drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-platform.c now.

So actually the proper fix is, IMO, to convert:

+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int xgbe_platform_suspend(struct device *dev)

to

+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int xgbe_platform_suspend(struct device *dev)

so that it doesn't fire again.

David, would you prefer a patch against linux-next?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--