[PATCH] rtl8xxxu: mark symbol static where possible

We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c:1557:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'rtl8192eu_power_off' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
So this patch marks this function with 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index 883fd98..4d975f0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c

@@ -2701,7 +2701,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup_port(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
 	return mv88e6xxx_port_write(chip, port, PORT_DEFAULT_VLAN, 0x0000);
 }
 
-int mv88e6xxx_g1_set_switch_mac(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u8 *addr)
+static int mv88e6xxx_g1_set_switch_mac(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u8 *addr)
 {
 	int err;
 

-- 
2.7.4

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:32 AM GMT, Baoyou Xie wrote:

Probably a mix-up - your patch doesn't match the description.

Thanks,
Jakub

From: Jakub Sitnicki <redacted>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:37:15 +0200

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:32 AM GMT, Baoyou Xie wrote:

quoted

We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c:1557:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'rtl8192eu_power_off' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
So this patch marks this function with 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index 883fd98..4d975f0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c

@@ -2701,7 +2701,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup_port(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
 	return mv88e6xxx_port_write(chip, port, PORT_DEFAULT_VLAN, 0x0000);
 }
 
-int mv88e6xxx_g1_set_switch_mac(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u8 *addr)
+static int mv88e6xxx_g1_set_switch_mac(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u8 *addr)
 {
 	int err;

Probably a mix-up - your patch doesn't match the description.

Agreed, please fix your subject line and commit message.