linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-10-20 · open the first message on its own page

linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-20 00:01:46

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got conflicts in:

  include/linux/netdevice.h
  net/core/dev.c

between commit:

  e4961b076885 ("net: core: Correctly iterate over lower adjacency list")

from the net tree and commit:

  1a3f060c1a47 ("net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices")
  f1170fd462c6 ("net: Remove all_adj_list and its references")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the net-next tree version) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

From: Ido Schimmel <hidden>
Date: 2016-10-20 06:37:40

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:01:42AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got conflicts in:

  include/linux/netdevice.h
  net/core/dev.c

between commit:

  e4961b076885 ("net: core: Correctly iterate over lower adjacency list")

from the net tree and commit:

  1a3f060c1a47 ("net: Introduce new api for walking upper and lower devices")
  f1170fd462c6 ("net: Remove all_adj_list and its references")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the net-next tree version) and can carry the
fix as necessary.
Yes, net-next is correct. Thanks Stephen!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help