[PATCH] vmxnet3: mark vmxnet3_rq_destroy_all_rxdataring() static

We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c:1643:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'vmxnet3_rq_destroy_all_rxdataring' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
so this patch marks this function with 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c
index c68fe49..fc68dd4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c

@@ -1639,7 +1639,7 @@ static void vmxnet3_rq_destroy(struct vmxnet3_rx_queue *rq,
 	}
 }
 
-void
+static void
 vmxnet3_rq_destroy_all_rxdataring(struct vmxnet3_adapter *adapter)
 {
 	int i;

-- 
2.7.4

On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 4:11:59 PM CEST Baoyou Xie wrote:

We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c:1643:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'vmxnet3_rq_destroy_all_rxdataring' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
so this patch marks this function with 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <redacted>

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

From: Baoyou Xie <redacted>
Date: Tue,  6 Sep 2016 16:11:59 +0800

We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c:1643:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'vmxnet3_rq_destroy_all_rxdataring' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
so this patch marks this function with 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <redacted>

This doesn't apply cleanly to net-next.