From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Date: 2016-09-12 10:21:45
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
With the batch changes that translated transient actions into
a temporary list we lost in the translation the fact that
tcf_action_destroy() will eventually delete the action from
the permanent location if the refcount is zero.
Example of what broke:
...add a gact action to drop
sudo $TC actions add action drop index 10
...now retrieve it, looks good
sudo $TC actions get action gact index 10
...retrieve it again and find it is gone!
sudo $TC actions get action gact index 10
Fixes:
22dc13c837c3 ("net_sched: convert tcf_exts from list to pointer array"),
824a7e8863b3 ("net_sched: remove an unnecessary list_del()")
f07fed82ad79 ("net_sched: remove the leftover cleanup_a()")
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
---
net/sched/act_api.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
@@ -612,8 +622,15 @@ int tcf_action_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,gotoerr;}act->order=i;+if(ovr)+act->tcfa_refcnt+=1;list_add_tail(&act->list,actions);}++/* Remove the temp refcnt which was necessary to protect against+*destroyinganexistingactionwhichwasbeingreplaced+*/+cleanup_a(actions,ovr);return0;err:
From: Cong Wang <hidden> Date: 2016-09-12 17:19:16
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
With the batch changes that translated transient actions into
a temporary list we lost in the translation the fact that
tcf_action_destroy() will eventually delete the action from
the permanent location if the refcount is zero.
Example of what broke:
...add a gact action to drop
sudo $TC actions add action drop index 10
...now retrieve it, looks good
sudo $TC actions get action gact index 10
...retrieve it again and find it is gone!
sudo $TC actions get action gact index 10
Fixes:
22dc13c837c3 ("net_sched: convert tcf_exts from list to pointer array"),
824a7e8863b3 ("net_sched: remove an unnecessary list_del()")
f07fed82ad79 ("net_sched: remove the leftover cleanup_a()")
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
---
net/sched/act_api.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
How about tcfa_bindcnt?
I hate to point out coding style issue, but since you need to update
the patch anyway, please add two spaces surround '-='.
I think checkpatch.pl should be able to catch this.
quoted hunk
+ }+}+ int tcf_action_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla, struct nlattr *est, char *name, int ovr, int bind, struct list_head *actions)
@@ -612,8 +622,15 @@ int tcf_action_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla, goto err; } act->order = i;+ if (ovr)
Need to check this boolean? It looks like we need this for !ovr case too?
+ act->tcfa_refcnt+=1;
Ditto for coding style.
quoted hunk
list_add_tail(&act->list, actions); }++ /* Remove the temp refcnt which was necessary to protect against+ * destroying an existing action which was being replaced+ */+ cleanup_a(actions, ovr); return 0; err:
From: Cong Wang <hidden> Date: 2016-09-14 16:32:24
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
With the batch changes that translated transient actions into
a temporary list we lost in the translation the fact that
tcf_action_destroy() will eventually delete the action from
the permanent location if the refcount is zero.
Example of what broke:
...add a gact action to drop
sudo $TC actions add action drop index 10
...now retrieve it, looks good
sudo $TC actions get action gact index 10
...retrieve it again and find it is gone!
sudo $TC actions get action gact index 10
Fixes:
22dc13c837c3 ("net_sched: convert tcf_exts from list to pointer array"),
824a7e8863b3 ("net_sched: remove an unnecessary list_del()")
f07fed82ad79 ("net_sched: remove the leftover cleanup_a()")
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Maybe the changelog/comment needs slightly improved,
but that is a very minor issue. So,
Acked-by: Cong Wang <redacted>