[PATCH 0720/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

DORMANTno replies

From: Baole Ni <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-02 16:07:08
Also in: intel-wired-lan, lkml
Subsystem: intel ethernet drivers, networking drivers, the rest · Maintainers: Tony Nguyen, Przemek Kitszel, Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
index 6d8c39a..bd6d1fb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 
 #define COPYBREAK_DEFAULT 256
 unsigned int copybreak = COPYBREAK_DEFAULT;
-module_param(copybreak, uint, 0644);
+module_param(copybreak, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(copybreak,
 		 "Maximum size of packet that is copied to a new buffer on receive");
 
-- 
2.9.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help