[PATCH 1084/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <redacted>
---
 net/802/mrp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/802/mrp.c b/net/802/mrp.c
index 72db278..4ff215f 100644
--- a/net/802/mrp.c
+++ b/net/802/mrp.c

@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@
 #include <asm/unaligned.h>
 
 static unsigned int mrp_join_time __read_mostly = 200;
-module_param(mrp_join_time, uint, 0644);
+module_param(mrp_join_time, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(mrp_join_time, "Join time in ms (default 200ms)");
 
 static unsigned int mrp_periodic_time __read_mostly = 1000;
-module_param(mrp_periodic_time, uint, 0644);
+module_param(mrp_periodic_time, uint, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(mrp_periodic_time, "Periodic time in ms (default 1s)");
 
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

-- 
2.9.2

On Tue,  2 Aug 2016 20:15:02 +0800
Baole Ni [off-list ref] wrote:

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

NACK!

I find 0444 more readable than S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH.

-- Steve