Since the sendto syscall doesn't have msg_control buffer,
the sock_tx_timestamp() in packet_snd() cannot work correctly because
the socks.fsflags is set to 0.
So, this patch sets the fsflags from sk.sk_tsflags if the msg_control
buffer doesn't exist.
Fixes: c14ac9451c34 ("sock: enable timestamping using control messages")
Cc: <redacted>
Reported-by: Kazuya Mizuguchi <redacted>
Reported-by: Keita Kobayashi <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
---
I'm not sure the network stack world. So, I submit this patch as RFC.
This patch looks like a quick hack, but it could resolve an our issue.
This issue happens on our platform (r8a7795-salvator-x).
The test command is:
# ptp4l -i eth0 -p /dev/ptp0 -m -q -f /etc/linuxptp/gPTP.cfg
The failure result:
ptp4l[26.815]: selected /dev/ptp0 as PTP clock
ptp4l[26.872]: port 1: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on INITIALIZE
ptp4l[26.872]: port 0: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on INITIALIZE
ptp4l[27.873]: timed out while polling for tx timestamp
ptp4l[27.873]: increasing tx_timestamp_timeout may correct this issue, but it is likely caused by a driver bug
ptp4l[27.873]: port 1: send peer delay request failed
ptp4l[27.873]: port 1: LISTENING to FAULTY on FAULT_DETECTED (FT_UNSPECIFIED)
The result after the patch is applied (or the c14ac9451c34 is reverted):
ptp4l[64.639]: selected /dev/ptp0 as PTP clock
ptp4l[64.688]: port 1: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on INITIALIZE
ptp4l[64.688]: port 0: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on INITIALIZE
ptp4l[71.841]: port 1: LISTENING to MASTER on ANNOUNCE_RECEIPT_TIMEOUT_EXPIRES
ptp4l[71.841]: selected best master clock 2e090a.fffe.00a2df
ptp4l[71.841]: assuming the grand master role
net/packet/af_packet.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
@@ -2887,6 +2887,11 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)err=sock_cmsg_send(sk,msg,&sockc);if(unlikely(err))gotoout_unlock;+}else{+/* Set tsflags from sk because a syscall (e.g. sendto) doesn't+*havemsg_controlbuffer.+*/+sockc.tsflags=sk->sk_tsflags;}if(sock->type==SOCK_RAW)
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> Date: 2016-07-15 15:31:49
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Yoshihiro Shimoda
[off-list ref] wrote:
Since the sendto syscall doesn't have msg_control buffer,
the sock_tx_timestamp() in packet_snd() cannot work correctly because
the socks.fsflags is set to 0.
You're right. __sock_tx_timestamp used to take sk->sk_tsflags as
input, now it relies solely on this parameter tsflags. All callsites
must either pass sk->sk_tsflags directly or initialize sockc.tsflags
to this value.
@@ -2887,6 +2887,11 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)err=sock_cmsg_send(sk,msg,&sockc);if(unlikely(err))gotoout_unlock;+}else{+/* Set tsflags from sk because a syscall (e.g. sendto) doesn't+*havemsg_controlbuffer.+*/+sockc.tsflags=sk->sk_tsflags;}
Better to follow the example of other protocols. In all three packet
variants, make the following initialization change:
- sockc.tsflags = 0;
+ sockc.tsflags = sk->sk_tsflags;
(I had to remove some recipients, because my reply was marked as spam
and dropped otherwise..)
From: Willem de Bruijn
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2016 12:31 AM
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Yoshihiro Shimoda
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Since the sendto syscall doesn't have msg_control buffer,
the sock_tx_timestamp() in packet_snd() cannot work correctly because
the socks.fsflags is set to 0.
You're right. __sock_tx_timestamp used to take sk->sk_tsflags as
input, now it relies solely on this parameter tsflags. All callsites
must either pass sk->sk_tsflags directly or initialize sockc.tsflags
to this value.
@@ -2887,6 +2887,11 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)err=sock_cmsg_send(sk,msg,&sockc);if(unlikely(err))gotoout_unlock;+}else{+/* Set tsflags from sk because a syscall (e.g. sendto) doesn't+*havemsg_controlbuffer.+*/+sockc.tsflags=sk->sk_tsflags;}
Better to follow the example of other protocols. In all three packet
variants, make the following initialization change:
- sockc.tsflags = 0;
+ sockc.tsflags = sk->sk_tsflags;
Thank you for the suggestion. I submitted a fixed patch now.
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
(I had to remove some recipients, because my reply was marked as spam
and dropped otherwise..)