Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2016-05-04

Re: [PATCH next-next 2/7] gre: Move utility functions to common headers

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2016-05-04 16:45:08

From: Jiri Benc <redacted>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 10:35:49 +0200
On Wed, 04 May 2016 00:53:16 -0400 (EDT), David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Jiri Benc <redacted>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 13:29:44 +0200
quoted
How do we resolve the conflict between net and net-next? I'd prefer
gre_parse_header to return the header length. I can submit a patch for
net-next that does this; that would substantially ease the merge.
Jiri, I just did the net --> net-next merge.  Please send me something on
top of that which does what you like.
The patch http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/617940/ still applies and
does the right thing even post merge.

Note that the merge reintroduced the bug fixed by b7f8fe251e46 (the
mentioned patch fixes this, too).
Awesome, I'll use that, thanks Jiri.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help