Re: [PATCH] ssb: host_soc depends on sprom

Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] writes:

Drivers that use the SSB sprom functionality typically 'select SSB_SPROM'
from Kconfig, but CONFIG_SSB_HOST_SOC misses this, which results in
a build failure unless at least one of the other drivers that selects
it is enabled:

drivers/built-in.o: In function `ssb_host_soc_get_invariants':
(.text+0x459494): undefined reference to `ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback'

This adds the same select statement that is used elsewhere.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 541c9a84cd85 ("ssb: pick SoC invariants code from MIPS BCM47xx arch")
---
I'm not sure who the right person is to pick up the fix. The patch that
introduced the problem was merged by Kalle through the iwlwifi tree.

I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my
wireless-drivers trees.

-- 
Kalle Valo

From: Kalle Valo <redacted>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 08:46:29 +0200

I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my
wireless-drivers trees.

+1

The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other
ones, which means we can build the framwork without any
front-end, but that results in a warning:

drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to
shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on
any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build
without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first
place.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code")
Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>
---

On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote:

I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my
wireless-drivers trees.

I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take
that one too?

diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c
index cde5ff7529eb..d1a750760cf3 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/main.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c

@@ -613,9 +613,10 @@ out:
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus,
-			    ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants,
-			    unsigned long baseaddr)
+static int __maybe_unused
+ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus,
+		 ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants,
+		 unsigned long baseaddr)
 {
 	int err;
 

The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other
ones, which means we can build the framwork without any
front-end, but that results in a warning:

drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to
shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on
any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build
without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first
place.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code")
Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>
---
Resent to linux-wireless as requested

diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c
index cde5ff7529eb..d1a750760cf3 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/main.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c

@@ -613,9 +613,10 @@ out:
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus,
-			    ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants,
-			    unsigned long baseaddr)
+static int __maybe_unused
+ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus,
+		 ssb_invariants_func_t get_invariants,
+		 unsigned long baseaddr)
 {
 	int err;
 

The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other
ones, which means we can build the framwork without any
front-end, but that results in a warning:

drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to
shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on
any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build
without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first
place.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code")
Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>

Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers.git.

Kalle Valo

The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other
ones, which means we can build the framwork without any
front-end, but that results in a warning:

drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to
shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on
any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build
without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first
place.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code")
Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>

Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers.git.

Kalle Valo

The SoC variant of the ssb code is now optional like the other
ones, which means we can build the framwork without any
front-end, but that results in a warning:

drivers/ssb/main.c:616:12: warning: 'ssb_bus_register' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

This annotates the ssb_bus_register function as __maybe_unused to
shut up the warning. A configuration like this will not work on
any hardware of course, but we still want this to silently build
without warnings if the configuration is allowed in the first
place.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 845da6e58e19 ("ssb: add Kconfig entry for compiling SoC related code")
Acked-by: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>

Thanks, applied to wireless-drivers.git.

Kalle Valo