linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c

between commit:

  366ce6031529 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Add FDB lock to prevent session interleaving")

from the net tree and commit:

  54a732018d8e ("mlxsw: spectrum: Adjust switchdev ops for VLAN devices")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
index 80e266063aee,4cdc18e72222..000000000000

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_switchdev.c

@@@ -650,7 -1057,14 +1057,15 @@@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_fdb_dump(struc
  	if (!sfd_pl)
  		return -ENOMEM;
  
 +	mutex_lock(&mlxsw_sp_port->mlxsw_sp->fdb_lock);
+ 	if (mlxsw_sp_port_is_vport(mlxsw_sp_port)) {
+ 		u16 tmp;
+ 
+ 		tmp = mlxsw_sp_vport_vfid_get(mlxsw_sp_port);
+ 		vport_fid = mlxsw_sp_vfid_to_fid(tmp);
+ 		vport_vid = mlxsw_sp_vport_vid_get(mlxsw_sp_port);
+ 	}
+ 
  	mlxsw_reg_sfd_pack(sfd_pl, MLXSW_REG_SFD_OP_QUERY_DUMP, 0);
  	do {
  		mlxsw_reg_sfd_num_rec_set(sfd_pl, MLXSW_REG_SFD_REC_MAX_COUNT);

Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:15:05AM IST, sfr@canb.auug.org.au wrote:

Hi Stephen,

The lock can be moved further down, just before mlxsw_reg_sfd_pack.
Other than that everything looks fine. Thank you!

+ 	if (mlxsw_sp_port_is_vport(mlxsw_sp_port)) {
+ 		u16 tmp;
+ 
+ 		tmp = mlxsw_sp_vport_vfid_get(mlxsw_sp_port);
+ 		vport_fid = mlxsw_sp_vfid_to_fid(tmp);
+ 		vport_vid = mlxsw_sp_vport_vid_get(mlxsw_sp_port);
+ 	}
+ 
 	mlxsw_reg_sfd_pack(sfd_pl, MLXSW_REG_SFD_OP_QUERY_DUMP, 0);
 	do {
 		mlxsw_reg_sfd_num_rec_set(sfd_pl, MLXSW_REG_SFD_REC_MAX_COUNT);

Hi Ido,

On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:11:02 +0200 Ido Schimmel [off-list ref] wrote:

The lock can be moved further down, just before mlxsw_reg_sfd_pack.
Other than that everything looks fine. Thank you!

Thanks, I wasn't sure but I will do that tomorrow (unless Dave beats me to it).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

From: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:58:11 +1100

Hi Ido,

On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:11:02 +0200 Ido Schimmel [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The lock can be moved further down, just before mlxsw_reg_sfd_pack.
Other than that everything looks fine. Thank you!

Thanks, I wasn't sure but I will do that tomorrow (unless Dave beats me to it).

I did the merge but did not move the locking.  Feel free to send me
a patch to do so.