Re: [PATCH 2/2] can: xilinx: fix bug in bus error handling

On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 10:16AM +0530, Kedareswara rao Appana wrote:

Isn't it possible to move the function and avoid the forward
declaration?

	Sören

Hi Soren,

-----Original Message-----
From: Sören Brinkmann [mailto:soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 10:03 PM
To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
Cc: Anirudha Sarangi; wg@grandegger.com; mkl@pengutronix.de; Michal
Simek; Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao; linux-can@vger.kernel.org;
netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] can: xilinx: fix bug in bus error handling

On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 10:16AM +0530, Kedareswara rao Appana wrote:

quoted

Simply resetting the peripheral on bus off condition is not enough,
Because we also need to re-initialize the whole device.
This patch fixes this issue.

Signed-off-by: Kedareswara rao Appana <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c

b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c index 055d6f3..9aeb85f 100644

--- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c

@@ -529,6 +529,8 @@ static int xcan_rx(struct net_device *ndev)
 	return 1;
 }

+static void xcan_chip_stop(struct net_device *ndev);

Isn't it possible to move the function and avoid the forward declaration?

Yes it is possible to move the function will fix it in the next version of the patch.

Regards,
Kedar.

	Sören