From: Ben Cartwright-Cox <hidden> Date: 2015-10-11 21:31:13
Sending ICMP packets with raw sockets ends up in the SNMP counters
logging the type as the first byte of the IPv4 header rather than
the ICMP header (in nearly all cases this is seen as "OutType69".
This is fixed by adding the IP Header Length to the casting into
a icmphdr struct.
Signed-off-by: Ben Cartwright-Cox <redacted>
---
net/ipv4/raw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden> Date: 2015-10-11 22:10:54
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 20:55 +0000, Ben Cartwright-Cox wrote:
quoted hunk
Sending ICMP packets with raw sockets ends up in the SNMP counters
logging the type as the first byte of the IPv4 header rather than
the ICMP header (in nearly all cases this is seen as "OutType69".
This is fixed by adding the IP Header Length to the casting into
a icmphdr struct.
Signed-off-by: Ben Cartwright-Cox <redacted>
---
net/ipv4/raw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hmm... This seems to lack checks against a malicious user ?
The only guarantee you have here is that iphlen < length.
It is not enough.
Make sure you do not access not initialized memory or even non existent
one.
Forgive me for possibly being a little stupid here (This is my first
patch to Linux so I am slightly over my head)
Is this issue not addressed above the file where the following check is done?
if (iphlen > length)
goto error_free;
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 20:55 +0000, Ben Cartwright-Cox wrote:
quoted
Sending ICMP packets with raw sockets ends up in the SNMP counters
logging the type as the first byte of the IPv4 header rather than
the ICMP header (in nearly all cases this is seen as "OutType69".
This is fixed by adding the IP Header Length to the casting into
a icmphdr struct.
Signed-off-by: Ben Cartwright-Cox <redacted>
---
net/ipv4/raw.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hmm... This seems to lack checks against a malicious user ?
The only guarantee you have here is that iphlen < length.
It is not enough.
Make sure you do not access not initialized memory or even non existent
one.
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden> Date: 2015-10-11 22:43:07
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 23:17 +0100, Ben Cox wrote:
Forgive me for possibly being a little stupid here (This is my first
patch to Linux so I am slightly over my head)
Is this issue not addressed above the file where the following check is done?
if (iphlen > length)
goto error_free;
Imagine someone sends a frame, pretending it is ICMP, but containing
only the IPv4 header. And not a _single_ byte more.
length = 20
iphlen = 20 (if say ihl == 5)
We copied 20 bytes from user land.
But your code reads 21th byte.
Nice!
That works in my head at least, Sorry about not seeing that fairly
glaring memory issue there.
Are you sure " skb->transport_header += iphlen; " won't have a knock
on affect when it's given to NF_HOOK ( as in, would a potential
userspace program get something it does not expect anymore ) ?
How does submission work at this point if the above is not a issue
(apologies if this is already in a FAQ somewhere I missed)?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Eric Dumazet [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 15:44 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 15:43 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
But your code reads 21th byte.
BTW, nice catch !
Maybe the following one.
1) We properly set transport header
2) We use icmp_hdr() helper.
From: Eric Dumazet <hidden> Date: 2015-10-11 23:38:09
Please do not top-post on netdev and/or lkml
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 00:14 +0100, Ben Cox wrote:
Nice!
That works in my head at least, Sorry about not seeing that fairly
glaring memory issue there.
No problem, this is why we review patches ;)
Are you sure " skb->transport_header += iphlen; " won't have a knock
on affect when it's given to NF_HOOK ( as in, would a potential
userspace program get something it does not expect anymore ) ?
netfilter does not depend on transport_header being set (otherwise as
you can see RAW packets would have problems with netfilter since the
very beginning.
How does submission work at this point if the above is not a issue
(apologies if this is already in a FAQ somewhere I missed)?
Just send a V2 of the patch, using following title :
[PATCH v2 net] raw: increment correct SNMP counters for ICMP messages
I'll add my 'Acked-by:' after your 'Signed-off-by:'
Thanks !