Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (ipvs)

2 messages, 2 authors, 2015-10-02 · open the first message on its own page

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (ipvs)

From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Date: 2015-10-01 17:26:33

On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

Changes since 20150930:
on x86_64:

../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c: In function 'ip_vs_leave':
../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:584:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'ip_vs_addr_is_unicast' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      ip_vs_addr_is_unicast(net, svc->af, &iph->daddr)) {
      ^
../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c: In function 'ip_vs_out':
../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1177:14: warning: unused variable 'net' [-Wunused-variable]
  struct net *net = ipvs->net;
              ^


Full randconfig file is attached.


-- 
~Randy

Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 1 (ipvs)

From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2015-10-02 00:45:50

Hi Randy,

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:26:14AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 09/30/15 23:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
quoted
Hi all,

Changes since 20150930:
on x86_64:

../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c: In function 'ip_vs_leave':
../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:584:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'ip_vs_addr_is_unicast' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      ip_vs_addr_is_unicast(net, svc->af, &iph->daddr)) {
      ^
../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c: In function 'ip_vs_out':
../net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1177:14: warning: unused variable 'net' [-Wunused-variable]
  struct net *net = ipvs->net;
Thanks for reporting this problem.

I have the following patch queued up in the ipvs-next tree
and plan to send a pull request for it later today.

From: "Eric W. Biederman" <redacted>
Subject: [PATCH] ipvs: Don't protect ip_vs_addr_is_unicast with CONFIG_SYSCTL

I arranged the code so that the compiler can remove the unecessary bits
in ip_vs_leave when CONFIG_SYSCTL is unset, and removed an explicit
CONFIG_SYSCTL.

Unfortunately when rebasing my work on top of that of Alex Gartrell I
missed the fact that the newly added function ip_vs_addr_is_unicast was
surrounded by CONFIG_SYSCTL.

So remove the now unnecessary CONFIG_SYSCTL guards around
ip_vs_addr_is_unicast.  It is causing build failures today when
CONFIG_SYSCTL is not selected and any self respecting compiler will
notice that sysctl_cache_bypass is always false without CONFIG_SYSCTL
and not include the logic from the function ip_vs_addr_is_unicast in
the compiled code.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <redacted>
Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
---
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
index 37dd77a3d0fb..d08df435c2aa 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
@@ -547,7 +547,6 @@ ip_vs_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	return cp;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
 static inline int ip_vs_addr_is_unicast(struct net *net, int af,
 					union nf_inet_addr *addr)
 {
@@ -557,7 +556,6 @@ static inline int ip_vs_addr_is_unicast(struct net *net, int af,
 #endif
 	return (inet_addr_type(net, addr->ip) == RTN_UNICAST);
 }
-#endif
 
 /*
  *  Pass or drop the packet.
-- 
2.1.4
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help