[PATCH 1/1] commit c6825c0976fa7893692e0e43b09740b419b23c09 upstream.

Subsystems: netfilter, networking [general], the rest

STALE3956d REVIEWED: 4 (4M)

1 review trailer (1 from subsystem maintainers).

7 messages, 3 authors, 2015-11-06 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH 1/1] commit c6825c0976fa7893692e0e43b09740b419b23c09 upstream.

From: Ani Sinha <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-26 18:55:39

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get

Lets look at destroy_conntrack:

hlist_nulls_del_rcu(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].hnnode);
...
nf_conntrack_free(ct)
	kmem_cache_free(net->ct.nf_conntrack_cachep, ct);

net->ct.nf_conntrack_cachep is created with SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU.

The hash is protected by rcu, so readers look up conntracks without
locks.
A conntrack is removed from the hash, but in this moment a few readers
still can use the conntrack. Then this conntrack is released and another
thread creates conntrack with the same address and the equal tuple.
After this a reader starts to validate the conntrack:
* It's not dying, because a new conntrack was created
* nf_ct_tuple_equal() returns true.

But this conntrack is not initialized yet, so it can not be used by two
threads concurrently. In this case BUG_ON may be triggered from
nf_nat_setup_info().

Florian Westphal suggested to check the confirm bit too. I think it's
right.

task 1			task 2			task 3
			nf_conntrack_find_get
			 ____nf_conntrack_find
destroy_conntrack
 hlist_nulls_del_rcu
 nf_conntrack_free
 kmem_cache_free
						__nf_conntrack_alloc
						 kmem_cache_alloc
						 memset(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_MAX],
			 if (nf_ct_is_dying(ct))
			 if (!nf_ct_tuple_equal()

I'm not sure, that I have ever seen this race condition in a real life.
Currently we are investigating a bug, which is reproduced on a few nodes.
In our case one conntrack is initialized from a few tasks concurrently,
we don't have any other explanation for this.

<2>[46267.083061] kernel BUG at net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:322!
...
<4>[46267.083951] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01e00a4>]  [<ffffffffa01e00a4>] nf_nat_setup_info+0x564/0x590 [nf_nat]
...
<4>[46267.085549] Call Trace:
<4>[46267.085622]  [<ffffffffa023421b>] alloc_null_binding+0x5b/0xa0 [iptable_nat]
<4>[46267.085697]  [<ffffffffa02342bc>] nf_nat_rule_find+0x5c/0x80 [iptable_nat]
<4>[46267.085770]  [<ffffffffa0234521>] nf_nat_fn+0x111/0x260 [iptable_nat]
<4>[46267.085843]  [<ffffffffa0234798>] nf_nat_out+0x48/0xd0 [iptable_nat]
<4>[46267.085919]  [<ffffffff814841b9>] nf_iterate+0x69/0xb0
<4>[46267.085991]  [<ffffffff81494e70>] ? ip_finish_output+0x0/0x2f0
<4>[46267.086063]  [<ffffffff81484374>] nf_hook_slow+0x74/0x110
<4>[46267.086133]  [<ffffffff81494e70>] ? ip_finish_output+0x0/0x2f0
<4>[46267.086207]  [<ffffffff814b5890>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x20
<4>[46267.086277]  [<ffffffff81495204>] ip_output+0xa4/0xc0
<4>[46267.086346]  [<ffffffff814b65a4>] raw_sendmsg+0x8b4/0x910
<4>[46267.086419]  [<ffffffff814c10fa>] inet_sendmsg+0x4a/0xb0
<4>[46267.086491]  [<ffffffff814459aa>] ? sock_update_classid+0x3a/0x50
<4>[46267.086562]  [<ffffffff81444d67>] sock_sendmsg+0x117/0x140
<4>[46267.086638]  [<ffffffff8151997b>] ? _spin_unlock_bh+0x1b/0x20
<4>[46267.086712]  [<ffffffff8109d370>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
<4>[46267.086785]  [<ffffffff81495e80>] ? do_ip_setsockopt+0x90/0xd80
<4>[46267.086858]  [<ffffffff8100be0e>] ? call_function_interrupt+0xe/0x20
<4>[46267.086936]  [<ffffffff8118cb10>] ? ub_slab_ptr+0x20/0x90
<4>[46267.087006]  [<ffffffff8118cb10>] ? ub_slab_ptr+0x20/0x90
<4>[46267.087081]  [<ffffffff8118f2e8>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xd8/0x1e0
<4>[46267.087151]  [<ffffffff81445599>] sys_sendto+0x139/0x190
<4>[46267.087229]  [<ffffffff81448c0d>] ? sock_setsockopt+0x16d/0x6f0
<4>[46267.087303]  [<ffffffff810efa47>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1d7/0x200
<4>[46267.087378]  [<ffffffff810ef795>] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x265/0x290
<4>[46267.087454]  [<ffffffff81474885>] ? compat_sys_setsockopt+0x75/0x210
<4>[46267.087531]  [<ffffffff81474b5f>] compat_sys_socketcall+0x13f/0x210
<4>[46267.087607]  [<ffffffff8104dea3>] ia32_sysret+0x0/0x5
<4>[46267.087676] Code: 91 20 e2 01 75 29 48 89 de 4c 89 f7 e8 56 fa ff ff 85 c0 0f 84 68 fc ff ff 0f b6 4d c6 41 8b 45 00 e9 4d fb ff ff e8 7c 19 e9 e0 <0f> 0b eb fe f6 05 17 91 20 e2 80 74 ce 80 3d 5f 2e 00 00 00 74
<1>[46267.088023] RIP  [<ffffffffa01e00a4>] nf_nat_setup_info+0x564/0x590

Cc: Eric Dumazet <redacted>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <redacted>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <redacted>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <redacted>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <redacted>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 9a46908..fd0f7a3 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c

@@ -309,6 +309,21 @@ static void death_by_timeout(unsigned long ul_conntrack)
 	nf_ct_put(ct);
 }
 
+static inline bool
+nf_ct_key_equal(struct nf_conntrack_tuple_hash *h,
+			const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple,
+			u16 zone)
+{
+	struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
+
+	/* A conntrack can be recreated with the equal tuple,
+	 * so we need to check that the conntrack is confirmed
+	 */
+	return nf_ct_tuple_equal(tuple, &h->tuple) &&
+		nf_ct_zone(ct) == zone &&
+		nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct);
+}
+
 /*
  * Warning :
  * - Caller must take a reference on returned object

@@ -330,8 +345,7 @@ ____nf_conntrack_find(struct net *net, u16 zone,
 	local_bh_disable();
 begin:
 	hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(h, n, &net->ct.hash[bucket], hnnode) {
-		if (nf_ct_tuple_equal(tuple, &h->tuple) &&
-		    nf_ct_zone(nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h)) == zone) {
+		if (nf_ct_key_equal(h, tuple, zone)) {
 			NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, found);
 			local_bh_enable();
 			return h;

@@ -378,8 +392,7 @@ begin:
 			     !atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use)))
 			h = NULL;
 		else {
-			if (unlikely(!nf_ct_tuple_equal(tuple, &h->tuple) ||
-				     nf_ct_zone(ct) != zone)) {
+			if (unlikely(!nf_ct_key_equal(h, tuple, zone))) {
 				nf_ct_put(ct);
 				goto begin;
 			}

-- 
1.8.1.4

Re: [PATCH 1/1] commit c6825c0976fa7893692e0e43b09740b419b23c09 upstream.

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: 2015-10-26 20:06:33

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:55:39AM -0700, Ani Sinha wrote:

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get

Please, no need to Cc everyone here. Please, submit your Netfilter
patches to netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org.

Moreover, it would be great if the subject includes something
descriptive on what you need, for this I'd suggest:

[PATCH -stable 3.4,backport] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get

I'm including Neal P. Murphy, he said he would help testing these
backports, getting a Tested-by: tag usually speeds up things too.

Burden is usually huge here, the easier you get it for us, the best.
Then we can review and, if no major concerns, I can submit this to
-stable.

Let me know if you have any other questions,
Thanks.

Re: [PATCH 1/1] commit c6825c0976fa7893692e0e43b09740b419b23c09 upstream.

From: Neal P. Murphy <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-28 06:36:50

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:06:33 +0100
Pablo Neira Ayuso [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:55:39AM -0700, Ani Sinha wrote:

quoted

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get

Please, no need to Cc everyone here. Please, submit your Netfilter
patches to netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org.

Moreover, it would be great if the subject includes something
descriptive on what you need, for this I'd suggest:

[PATCH -stable 3.4,backport] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get

I'm including Neal P. Murphy, he said he would help testing these
backports, getting a Tested-by: tag usually speeds up things too.

I hammered it a couple nights ago. First test was 5000 processes on 6 SMP CPUs opening and closing a port on a 'remote' host using the usual random source ports. Only got up to 32000 conntracks. The generator was a 64-bit Smoothwall KVM without the patch. The traffic passed through a 32-bit Smoothwall KVM with the patch. The target was on the VM host. No problems encountered. I suspect I didn't come close to triggering the original problem. Second test was a couple thousand processes all using the same source IP and port and dest IP and port. Still no problems. But these were perl scripts (and they used lots of RAM); perhaps a short C program would let me run more.

Any ideas on how I might test it more brutally?

N

[PATCH -stable 3.4,backport] commit c6825c0976fa7893692e0e43b09740b419b23c09 upstream.

From: Ani Sinha <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-02 19:11:13

netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get

Lets look at destroy_conntrack:

hlist_nulls_del_rcu(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].hnnode);
...
nf_conntrack_free(ct)
	kmem_cache_free(net->ct.nf_conntrack_cachep, ct);

net->ct.nf_conntrack_cachep is created with SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU.

The hash is protected by rcu, so readers look up conntracks without
locks.
A conntrack is removed from the hash, but in this moment a few readers
still can use the conntrack. Then this conntrack is released and another
thread creates conntrack with the same address and the equal tuple.
After this a reader starts to validate the conntrack:
* It's not dying, because a new conntrack was created
* nf_ct_tuple_equal() returns true.

But this conntrack is not initialized yet, so it can not be used by two
threads concurrently. In this case BUG_ON may be triggered from
nf_nat_setup_info().

Florian Westphal suggested to check the confirm bit too. I think it's
right.

task 1			task 2			task 3
			nf_conntrack_find_get
			 ____nf_conntrack_find
destroy_conntrack
 hlist_nulls_del_rcu
 nf_conntrack_free
 kmem_cache_free
						__nf_conntrack_alloc
						 kmem_cache_alloc
						 memset(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_MAX],
			 if (nf_ct_is_dying(ct))
			 if (!nf_ct_tuple_equal()

I'm not sure, that I have ever seen this race condition in a real life.
Currently we are investigating a bug, which is reproduced on a few nodes.
In our case one conntrack is initialized from a few tasks concurrently,
we don't have any other explanation for this.

<2>[46267.083061] kernel BUG at net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c:322!
...
<4>[46267.083951] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01e00a4>]  [<ffffffffa01e00a4>] nf_nat_setup_info+0x564/0x590 [nf_nat]
...
<4>[46267.085549] Call Trace:
<4>[46267.085622]  [<ffffffffa023421b>] alloc_null_binding+0x5b/0xa0 [iptable_nat]
<4>[46267.085697]  [<ffffffffa02342bc>] nf_nat_rule_find+0x5c/0x80 [iptable_nat]
<4>[46267.085770]  [<ffffffffa0234521>] nf_nat_fn+0x111/0x260 [iptable_nat]
<4>[46267.085843]  [<ffffffffa0234798>] nf_nat_out+0x48/0xd0 [iptable_nat]
<4>[46267.085919]  [<ffffffff814841b9>] nf_iterate+0x69/0xb0
<4>[46267.085991]  [<ffffffff81494e70>] ? ip_finish_output+0x0/0x2f0
<4>[46267.086063]  [<ffffffff81484374>] nf_hook_slow+0x74/0x110
<4>[46267.086133]  [<ffffffff81494e70>] ? ip_finish_output+0x0/0x2f0
<4>[46267.086207]  [<ffffffff814b5890>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x20
<4>[46267.086277]  [<ffffffff81495204>] ip_output+0xa4/0xc0
<4>[46267.086346]  [<ffffffff814b65a4>] raw_sendmsg+0x8b4/0x910
<4>[46267.086419]  [<ffffffff814c10fa>] inet_sendmsg+0x4a/0xb0
<4>[46267.086491]  [<ffffffff814459aa>] ? sock_update_classid+0x3a/0x50
<4>[46267.086562]  [<ffffffff81444d67>] sock_sendmsg+0x117/0x140
<4>[46267.086638]  [<ffffffff8151997b>] ? _spin_unlock_bh+0x1b/0x20
<4>[46267.086712]  [<ffffffff8109d370>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
<4>[46267.086785]  [<ffffffff81495e80>] ? do_ip_setsockopt+0x90/0xd80
<4>[46267.086858]  [<ffffffff8100be0e>] ? call_function_interrupt+0xe/0x20
<4>[46267.086936]  [<ffffffff8118cb10>] ? ub_slab_ptr+0x20/0x90
<4>[46267.087006]  [<ffffffff8118cb10>] ? ub_slab_ptr+0x20/0x90
<4>[46267.087081]  [<ffffffff8118f2e8>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xd8/0x1e0
<4>[46267.087151]  [<ffffffff81445599>] sys_sendto+0x139/0x190
<4>[46267.087229]  [<ffffffff81448c0d>] ? sock_setsockopt+0x16d/0x6f0
<4>[46267.087303]  [<ffffffff810efa47>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1d7/0x200
<4>[46267.087378]  [<ffffffff810ef795>] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x265/0x290
<4>[46267.087454]  [<ffffffff81474885>] ? compat_sys_setsockopt+0x75/0x210
<4>[46267.087531]  [<ffffffff81474b5f>] compat_sys_socketcall+0x13f/0x210
<4>[46267.087607]  [<ffffffff8104dea3>] ia32_sysret+0x0/0x5
<4>[46267.087676] Code: 91 20 e2 01 75 29 48 89 de 4c 89 f7 e8 56 fa ff ff 85 c0 0f 84 68 fc ff ff 0f b6 4d c6 41 8b 45 00 e9 4d fb ff ff e8 7c 19 e9 e0 <0f> 0b eb fe f6 05 17 91 20 e2 80 74 ce 80 3d 5f 2e 00 00 00 74
<1>[46267.088023] RIP  [<ffffffffa01e00a4>] nf_nat_setup_info+0x564/0x590

Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <redacted>
Tested-by: Neal P. Murphy <redacted>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 9a46908..fd0f7a3 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c

@@ -309,6 +309,21 @@ static void death_by_timeout(unsigned long ul_conntrack)
 	nf_ct_put(ct);
 }
 
+static inline bool
+nf_ct_key_equal(struct nf_conntrack_tuple_hash *h,
+			const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple,
+			u16 zone)
+{
+	struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
+
+	/* A conntrack can be recreated with the equal tuple,
+	 * so we need to check that the conntrack is confirmed
+	 */
+	return nf_ct_tuple_equal(tuple, &h->tuple) &&
+		nf_ct_zone(ct) == zone &&
+		nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct);
+}
+
 /*
  * Warning :
  * - Caller must take a reference on returned object

@@ -330,8 +345,7 @@ ____nf_conntrack_find(struct net *net, u16 zone,
 	local_bh_disable();
 begin:
 	hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(h, n, &net->ct.hash[bucket], hnnode) {
-		if (nf_ct_tuple_equal(tuple, &h->tuple) &&
-		    nf_ct_zone(nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h)) == zone) {
+		if (nf_ct_key_equal(h, tuple, zone)) {
 			NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, found);
 			local_bh_enable();
 			return h;

@@ -378,8 +392,7 @@ begin:
 			     !atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use)))
 			h = NULL;
 		else {
-			if (unlikely(!nf_ct_tuple_equal(tuple, &h->tuple) ||
-				     nf_ct_zone(ct) != zone)) {
+			if (unlikely(!nf_ct_key_equal(h, tuple, zone))) {
 				nf_ct_put(ct);
 				goto begin;
 			}

-- 
1.8.1.4

[PATCH -stable 3.4,backport] commit c6825c0976fa7893692e0e43b09740b419b23c09 upstream.

From: Ani Sinha <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-02 19:47:25

netfilter: nf_conntrack: don't release a conntrack with non-zero
refcnt

With this patch, the conntrack refcount is initially set to zero and
it is bumped once it is added to any of the list, so we fulfill
Eric's golden rule which is that all released objects always have a
refcount that equals zero.

Andrey Vagin reports that nf_conntrack_free can't be called for a
conntrack with non-zero ref-counter, because it can race with
nf_conntrack_find_get().

A conntrack slab is created with SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU. Non-zero
ref-counter says that this conntrack is used. So when we release
a conntrack with non-zero counter, we break this assumption.

CPU1                                    CPU2
____nf_conntrack_find()
                                        nf_ct_put()
                                         destroy_conntrack()
                                        ...
                                        init_conntrack
                                         __nf_conntrack_alloc (set use = 1)
atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->use) (use = 2)
                                         if (!l4proto->new(ct, skb, dataoff, timeouts))
                                          nf_conntrack_free(ct); (use = 2 !!!)
                                        ...
                                        __nf_conntrack_alloc (set use = 1)
 if (!nf_ct_key_equal(h, tuple, zone))
  nf_ct_put(ct); (use = 0)
   destroy_conntrack()
                                        /* continue to work with CT */

After applying the path "[PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU
race in nf_conntrack_find_get" another bug was triggered in
destroy_conntrack():

<4>[67096.759334] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<2>[67096.759353] kernel BUG at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:211!
...
<4>[67096.759837] Pid: 498649, comm: atdd veid: 666 Tainted: G         C ---------------    2.6.32-042stab084.18 #1 042stab084_18 /DQ45CB
<4>[67096.759932] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa03d99ac>]  [<ffffffffa03d99ac>] destroy_conntrack+0x15c/0x190 [nf_conntrack]
<4>[67096.760255] Call Trace:
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff814844a7>] nf_conntrack_destroy+0x17/0x30
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffffa03d9bb5>] nf_conntrack_find_get+0x85/0x130 [nf_conntrack]
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffffa03d9fb2>] nf_conntrack_in+0x352/0xb60 [nf_conntrack]
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffffa048c771>] ipv4_conntrack_local+0x51/0x60 [nf_conntrack_ipv4]
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff81484419>] nf_iterate+0x69/0xb0
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff814b5b00>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x20
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff814845d4>] nf_hook_slow+0x74/0x110
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff814b5b00>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x20
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff814b66d5>] raw_sendmsg+0x775/0x910
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff8104c5a8>] ? flush_tlb_others_ipi+0x128/0x130
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff814c136a>] inet_sendmsg+0x4a/0xb0
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff81444e93>] ? sock_sendmsg+0x13/0x140
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff81444f97>] sock_sendmsg+0x117/0x140
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff8102e299>] ? native_smp_send_reschedule+0x49/0x60
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff81519beb>] ? _spin_unlock_bh+0x1b/0x20
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff8109d930>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff814960f0>] ? do_ip_setsockopt+0x90/0xd80
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff814457c9>] sys_sendto+0x139/0x190
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff810efa77>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1d7/0x200
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff810ef7c5>] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x265/0x290
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff81474daf>] compat_sys_socketcall+0x13f/0x210
<4>[67096.760255]  [<ffffffff8104dea3>] ia32_sysret+0x0/0x5

I have reused the original title for the RFC patch that Andrey posted and
most of the original patch description.

Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <redacted>
Tested-by: "Neal P. Murphy" <redacted> 
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 9a171b2..9a46908 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c

@@ -441,7 +441,9 @@ nf_conntrack_hash_check_insert(struct nf_conn *ct)
 			goto out;
 
 	add_timer(&ct->timeout);
-	nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general);
+	smp_wmb();
+	/* The caller holds a reference to this object */
+	atomic_set(&ct->ct_general.use, 2);
 	__nf_conntrack_hash_insert(ct, hash, repl_hash);
 	NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, insert);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);

@@ -732,11 +734,10 @@ __nf_conntrack_alloc(struct net *net, u16 zone,
 		nf_ct_zone->id = zone;
 	}
 #endif
-	/*
-	 * changes to lookup keys must be done before setting refcnt to 1
+	/* Because we use RCU lookups, we set ct_general.use to zero before
+	 * this is inserted in any list.
 	 */
-	smp_wmb();
-	atomic_set(&ct->ct_general.use, 1);
+	atomic_set(&ct->ct_general.use, 0);
 	return ct;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ZONES

@@ -759,6 +760,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_alloc);
 void nf_conntrack_free(struct nf_conn *ct)
 {
 	struct net *net = nf_ct_net(ct);
+	/* A freed object has refcnt == 0, that's
+	 * the golden rule for SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU
+	 */
+	NF_CT_ASSERT(atomic_read(&ct->ct_general.use) == 0);
 
 	nf_ct_ext_destroy(ct);
 	atomic_dec(&net->ct.count);

@@ -846,6 +851,9 @@ init_conntrack(struct net *net, struct nf_conn *tmpl,
 		NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, new);
 	}
 
+	/* Now it is inserted into the unconfirmed list, bump refcount */
+	nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general);
+
 	/* Overload tuple linked list to put us in unconfirmed list. */
 	hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].hnnode,
 		       &net->ct.unconfirmed);

-- 
1.8.1.4

Re: [PATCH 1/1] commit c6825c0976fa7893692e0e43b09740b419b23c09 upstream.

From: Ani Sinha <hidden>
Date: 2015-11-04 23:46:54

(removed a bunch of people from CC list)

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso [off-list ref] wrote:

Then we can review and, if no major concerns, I can submit this to
-stable.

Now that Neal has sufficiently tested the patches, is it OK to apply
to -stable or do you guys want me to do anything more?

Re: [PATCH 1/1] commit c6825c0976fa7893692e0e43b09740b419b23c09 upstream.

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: 2015-11-06 11:09:19

On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 03:46:54PM -0800, Ani Sinha wrote:

(removed a bunch of people from CC list)

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Then we can review and, if no major concerns, I can submit this to
-stable.

Now that Neal has sufficiently tested the patches, is it OK to apply
to -stable or do you guys want me to do anything more?

I'll be passing up this to -stable asap.

Thanks.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help