Re: Re: [PATCH] usbnet: dereference after null check in usbnet_start_xmit() and __usbnet_read_cmd()
From: Vivek Kumar Bhagat <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-20 04:43:38
Dear Bjorn,
quoted
This is wrong. There are usbnet minidrivers depending on info->tx_fixup being called with a NULL skb.
Also, if dev_hard_start_xmit() ensures that skb can not be NULL in usbnet_start_xmit()
then we should remove below check.
if (skb) <--- This check is confusing which says skb can be NULL.
skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
Best Regards,
Vivek
------- Original Message -------
Sender : Bjørn Mork[off-list ref]
Date : Aug 19, 2015 17:21 (GMT+05:30)
Title : Re: [PATCH] usbnet: dereference after null check in usbnet_start_xmit() and __usbnet_read_cmd()
Vivek Kumar Bhagat writes:
usbnet_start_xmit() - If info->tx_fixup is not defined by class driver, NULL check does not happen for skb pointer and leads to NULL dereference. __usbnet_read_cmd() - if data pointer is passed as NULL, memcpy will dereference NULL pointer.
That's two completely different issues. Mixing them in a single patch is only confusing things.
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kumar Bhagat --- drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c index 3c86b10..ec4d224 100644 --- a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c +++ b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c@@ -1294,6 +1294,8 @@ netdev_tx_t usbnet_start_xmit (struct sk_buff *skb, if (skb) skb_tx_timestamp(skb); + else + goto drop; // some devices want funky USB-level framing, for // win32 driver (usually) and/or hardware quirks
This is wrong. There are usbnet minidrivers depending on info->tx_fixup being called with a NULL skb.
quoted hunk
@@ -1906,7 +1908,8 @@ static int __usbnet_read_cmd(struct usbnet *dev, u8 cmd, u8 reqtype, buf = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); if (!buf) goto out; - } + } else + goto out; err = usb_control_msg(dev->udev, usb_rcvctrlpipe(dev->udev, 0), cmd, reqtype, value, index, buf, size,
This is also wrong. It makes __usbnet_read_cmd() return -ENOMEM if called with a NULL data pointer. I don't know if it is used, but it's perfectly valid to call __usbnet_read_cmd() with data == NULL if size == 0. No memcpy will happen in this case because usb_control_msg can only return 0 or an error Please don't submit any more such patches without proper justification. You cannot trust that someone will actually take the time to sanity check your changes. Patches claiming to fix a NULL dereference should at least provide an oops. Bjørn