From: Nicholas Mc Guire <hidden> Date: 2015-05-19 11:00:35
API compliance scanning with coccinelle flagged:
Converting milliseconds to jiffies by "val * HZ / 1000" is technically
is not a clean solution as it does not handle all corner cases correctly.
By changing the conversion to use msecs_to_jiffies(val) conversion is
correct in all cases.
in the current code:
mod_timer(&self->rx_defer_timer, jiffies + (10 * HZ / 1000));
for HZ < 100 (e.g. CONFIG_HZ == 64|32 in alpha) this effectively results
in no delay at all.
Patch was compile tested for x86_64_defconfig (implies CONFIG_USB_IRDA=m)
Patch is against 4.1-rc4 (localversion-next is -next-20150519)
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <redacted>
---
drivers/net/irda/irda-usb.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Date: 2015-05-19 14:32:21
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 12:51 +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
Converting milliseconds to jiffies by "val * HZ / 1000" is technically
is not a clean solution as it does not handle all corner cases correctly.
By changing the conversion to use msecs_to_jiffies(val) conversion is
correct in all cases.
in the current code:
mod_timer(&self->rx_defer_timer, jiffies + (10 * HZ / 1000));
for HZ < 100 (e.g. CONFIG_HZ == 64|32 in alpha) this effectively results
in no delay at all.
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date: 2015-05-19 20:46:00
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 07:32:15 -0700
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 12:51 +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
quoted
Converting milliseconds to jiffies by "val * HZ / 1000" is technically
is not a clean solution as it does not handle all corner cases correctly.
By changing the conversion to use msecs_to_jiffies(val) conversion is
correct in all cases.
in the current code:
mod_timer(&self->rx_defer_timer, jiffies + (10 * HZ / 1000));
for HZ < 100 (e.g. CONFIG_HZ == 64|32 in alpha) this effectively results
in no delay at all.
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Date: 2015-05-19 21:09:14
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:45 -0400, David Miller wrote:
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 07:32:15 -0700
quoted
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 12:51 +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
quoted
Converting milliseconds to jiffies by "val * HZ / 1000" is technically
is not a clean solution as it does not handle all corner cases correctly.
By changing the conversion to use msecs_to_jiffies(val) conversion is
correct in all cases.
in the current code:
mod_timer(&self->rx_defer_timer, jiffies + (10 * HZ / 1000));
for HZ < 100 (e.g. CONFIG_HZ == 64|32 in alpha) this effectively results
in no delay at all.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:09:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:45 -0400, David Miller wrote:
quoted
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 07:32:15 -0700
quoted
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 12:51 +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
quoted
Converting milliseconds to jiffies by "val * HZ / 1000" is technically
is not a clean solution as it does not handle all corner cases correctly.
By changing the conversion to use msecs_to_jiffies(val) conversion is
correct in all cases.
in the current code:
mod_timer(&self->rx_defer_timer, jiffies + (10 * HZ / 1000));
for HZ < 100 (e.g. CONFIG_HZ == 64|32 in alpha) this effectively results
in no delay at all.
The unnecessary () around msecs_to_jiffies could be removed.
The other thing that could be done is to use
max(1ul, msecs_to_jiffies())
so that there's always some delay even if HZ <= 50
I may be mistaken, but I am quite sure that msecs_to_jiffies() always returns
at least 1 in such situations. Otherwise there would be lots of converstions
to 0 in the kernel.
Guenter
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Date: 2015-05-20 03:57:23
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 18:44 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:09:07PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
The other thing that could be done is to use
max(1ul, msecs_to_jiffies())
so that there's always some delay even if HZ <= 50
I may be mistaken, but I am quite sure that msecs_to_jiffies() always returns
at least 1 in such situations. Otherwise there would be lots of conversions
to 0 in the kernel.
Thanks Guenter
Nope, you're not mistaken.
Non 0 constants always return a value > 0
The existing uses like max(1ul, msecs_to_jiffies(<variable>))
just guard against <variable> being 0.