Regression: TCP connections fail over wireless: bad cksum?

8 messages, 3 authors, 2014-09-05 · open the first message on its own page

Regression: TCP connections fail over wireless: bad cksum?

From: Ted Percival <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-04 20:26:10

Yesterday's linux-next build introduced a problem with wireless
networking on my machine. ie. next-20140901 worked fine but
next-20140902 does not seem able to sustain a TCP connection over
wireless. Wired networking works fine. I am using the brcmsmac driver
and the hardware is "Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless
LAN Controller (rev 01)".

Pings, even large pings (ping -s 16000) work fine but TCP connections hang.

I looked through the changes between the bad & good commits from the net
& net-next trees and I wonder if some of the changes to checksumming
have surfaced a problem with this driver. When I look at a tcpdump, it
indicates that all the checksums are wrong (although I don't know if
that is just due to hardware offload).

Here is a short trace of the hung connection attempt of
  curl http://lwn.net/

$ sudo tcpdump -vvn -i wlan0 port 80
tcpdump: listening on wlan0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
65535 bytes
13:20:15.120770 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22734, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x4fac), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 142315 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:16.121755 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22735, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x4bc3), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 143316 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:18.125748 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22736, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x43ef), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 145320 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:22.133743 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22737, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x3447), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 149328 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:30.149754 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22738, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x14f7), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 157344 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0


I don't see anything that looks related in dmesg. The only brcmsmac
messages I see are:

[  567.122218] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcmsmac: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed:
associated
[  567.122226] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: arp
filtering: 1 addresses (implement)
[  567.122231] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: qos
enabled: true (implement)
[  567.192283] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: qos
enabled: true (implement)

I am writing to linux-netdev rather than linux-wireless because
according to Next/SHA1s the wireless & wireless-next trees were not
updated between next-20140901 and next-20140902, but the net & net-next
trees were updated, so maybe the regression came from there. (I haven't
tested next-20140903 because it won't boot for unrelated reasons.)

Let me know if I should just file this in Bugzilla or what information I
can provide to help track this down, if it hasn't already been identified.

The here are the good (-) and bad (+) trees from Next/SHA1s at the
next-* tags mentioned earlier that I built from.

-net            38ab1fa981d543e1b00f4ffbce4ddb480cd2effe
+net            cc25f0cbe4409d6a573b1f3bf7020d5b04076ee9

-net-next       dace1b54726bffe1c009f7661e3cee6b762f30c8
+net-next       364a9e93243d1785f310c0964af0e24bf1adac03

-- 
Cheers,
-Ted

Re: Regression: TCP connections fail over wireless: bad cksum?

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-04 22:50:11

On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:11 -0600, Ted Percival wrote:
Yesterday's linux-next build introduced a problem with wireless
networking on my machine. ie. next-20140901 worked fine but
next-20140902 does not seem able to sustain a TCP connection over
wireless. Wired networking works fine. I am using the brcmsmac driver
and the hardware is "Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless
LAN Controller (rev 01)".

Pings, even large pings (ping -s 16000) work fine but TCP connections hang.

I looked through the changes between the bad & good commits from the net
& net-next trees and I wonder if some of the changes to checksumming
have surfaced a problem with this driver. When I look at a tcpdump, it
indicates that all the checksums are wrong (although I don't know if
that is just due to hardware offload).

Here is a short trace of the hung connection attempt of
  curl http://lwn.net/

$ sudo tcpdump -vvn -i wlan0 port 80
tcpdump: listening on wlan0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
65535 bytes
13:20:15.120770 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22734, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x4fac), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 142315 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:16.121755 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22735, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x4bc3), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 143316 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:18.125748 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22736, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x43ef), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 145320 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:22.133743 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22737, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x3447), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 149328 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:30.149754 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22738, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x14f7), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 157344 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0


I don't see anything that looks related in dmesg. The only brcmsmac
messages I see are:

[  567.122218] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcmsmac: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed:
associated
[  567.122226] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: arp
filtering: 1 addresses (implement)
[  567.122231] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: qos
enabled: true (implement)
[  567.192283] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: qos
enabled: true (implement)

I am writing to linux-netdev rather than linux-wireless because
according to Next/SHA1s the wireless & wireless-next trees were not
updated between next-20140901 and next-20140902, but the net & net-next
trees were updated, so maybe the regression came from there. (I haven't
tested next-20140903 because it won't boot for unrelated reasons.)

Let me know if I should just file this in Bugzilla or what information I
can provide to help track this down, if it hasn't already been identified.

The here are the good (-) and bad (+) trees from Next/SHA1s at the
next-* tags mentioned earlier that I built from.

-net            38ab1fa981d543e1b00f4ffbce4ddb480cd2effe
+net            cc25f0cbe4409d6a573b1f3bf7020d5b04076ee9

-net-next       dace1b54726bffe1c009f7661e3cee6b762f30c8
+net-next       364a9e93243d1785f310c0964af0e24bf1adac03
Could you post

ethtool -k wlan0

And try 

ethtool -K wlan tx off

Re: Regression: TCP connections fail over wireless: bad cksum?

From: Ted Percival <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-04 23:20:37

On 09/04/2014 04:50 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:11 -0600, Ted Percival wrote:
quoted
Yesterday's linux-next build introduced a problem with wireless
networking on my machine. ie. next-20140901 worked fine but
next-20140902 does not seem able to sustain a TCP connection over
wireless. Wired networking works fine. I am using the brcmsmac driver
and the hardware is "Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless
LAN Controller (rev 01)".

Pings, even large pings (ping -s 16000) work fine but TCP connections hang.

I looked through the changes between the bad & good commits from the net
& net-next trees and I wonder if some of the changes to checksumming
have surfaced a problem with this driver. When I look at a tcpdump, it
indicates that all the checksums are wrong (although I don't know if
that is just due to hardware offload).

Here is a short trace of the hung connection attempt of
  curl http://lwn.net/

$ sudo tcpdump -vvn -i wlan0 port 80
tcpdump: listening on wlan0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
65535 bytes
13:20:15.120770 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22734, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x4fac), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 142315 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:16.121755 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22735, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x4bc3), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 143316 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:18.125748 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22736, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x43ef), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 145320 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:22.133743 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22737, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x3447), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 149328 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:30.149754 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22738, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x14f7), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 157344 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0


I don't see anything that looks related in dmesg. The only brcmsmac
messages I see are:

[  567.122218] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcmsmac: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed:
associated
[  567.122226] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: arp
filtering: 1 addresses (implement)
[  567.122231] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: qos
enabled: true (implement)
[  567.192283] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: qos
enabled: true (implement)

I am writing to linux-netdev rather than linux-wireless because
according to Next/SHA1s the wireless & wireless-next trees were not
updated between next-20140901 and next-20140902, but the net & net-next
trees were updated, so maybe the regression came from there. (I haven't
tested next-20140903 because it won't boot for unrelated reasons.)

Let me know if I should just file this in Bugzilla or what information I
can provide to help track this down, if it hasn't already been identified.

The here are the good (-) and bad (+) trees from Next/SHA1s at the
next-* tags mentioned earlier that I built from.

-net            38ab1fa981d543e1b00f4ffbce4ddb480cd2effe
+net            cc25f0cbe4409d6a573b1f3bf7020d5b04076ee9

-net-next       dace1b54726bffe1c009f7661e3cee6b762f30c8
+net-next       364a9e93243d1785f310c0964af0e24bf1adac03
Could you post

ethtool -k wlan0

And try 

ethtool -K wlan tx off
# ethtool -k wlan0
Features for wlan0:
rx-checksumming: off [fixed]
tx-checksumming: off
	tx-checksum-ipv4: off [fixed]
	tx-checksum-ip-generic: off [fixed]
	tx-checksum-ipv6: off [fixed]
	tx-checksum-fcoe-crc: off [fixed]
	tx-checksum-sctp: off [fixed]
scatter-gather: off
	tx-scatter-gather: off [fixed]
	tx-scatter-gather-fraglist: off [fixed]
tcp-segmentation-offload: off
	tx-tcp-segmentation: off [fixed]
	tx-tcp-ecn-segmentation: off [fixed]
	tx-tcp6-segmentation: off [fixed]
udp-fragmentation-offload: off [fixed]
generic-segmentation-offload: off [requested on]
generic-receive-offload: on
large-receive-offload: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-offload: off [fixed]
tx-vlan-offload: off [fixed]
ntuple-filters: off [fixed]
receive-hashing: off [fixed]
highdma: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-filter: off [fixed]
vlan-challenged: off [fixed]
tx-lockless: off [fixed]
netns-local: on [fixed]
tx-gso-robust: off [fixed]
tx-fcoe-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-gre-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-ipip-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-sit-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-udp_tnl-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-mpls-segmentation: off [fixed]
fcoe-mtu: off [fixed]
tx-nocache-copy: off
loopback: off [fixed]
rx-fcs: off [fixed]
rx-all: off [fixed]
tx-vlan-stag-hw-insert: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-stag-hw-parse: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-stag-filter: off [fixed]
l2-fwd-offload: off [fixed]
busy-poll: off [fixed]

# ethtool -K wlan0 tx off
Cannot change tx-checksumming

I will try to isolate the commit that caused the regression.

Re: Regression: TCP connections fail over wireless: bad cksum?

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-04 23:28:08

On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 17:21 -0600, Ted Percival wrote:
# ethtool -k wlan0
Features for wlan0:
rx-checksumming: off [fixed]
tx-checksumming: off
	tx-checksum-ipv4: off [fixed]
	tx-checksum-ip-generic: off [fixed]
	tx-checksum-ipv6: off [fixed]
	tx-checksum-fcoe-crc: off [fixed]
	tx-checksum-sctp: off [fixed]
scatter-gather: off
	tx-scatter-gather: off [fixed]
	tx-scatter-gather-fraglist: off [fixed]
tcp-segmentation-offload: off
	tx-tcp-segmentation: off [fixed]
	tx-tcp-ecn-segmentation: off [fixed]
	tx-tcp6-segmentation: off [fixed]
udp-fragmentation-offload: off [fixed]
generic-segmentation-offload: off [requested on]
generic-receive-offload: on
large-receive-offload: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-offload: off [fixed]
tx-vlan-offload: off [fixed]
ntuple-filters: off [fixed]
receive-hashing: off [fixed]
highdma: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-filter: off [fixed]
vlan-challenged: off [fixed]
tx-lockless: off [fixed]
netns-local: on [fixed]
tx-gso-robust: off [fixed]
tx-fcoe-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-gre-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-ipip-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-sit-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-udp_tnl-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-mpls-segmentation: off [fixed]
fcoe-mtu: off [fixed]
tx-nocache-copy: off
loopback: off [fixed]
rx-fcs: off [fixed]
rx-all: off [fixed]
tx-vlan-stag-hw-insert: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-stag-hw-parse: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-stag-filter: off [fixed]
l2-fwd-offload: off [fixed]
busy-poll: off [fixed]

# ethtool -K wlan0 tx off
Cannot change tx-checksumming

I will try to isolate the commit that caused the regression.
Ah well, I guess we know it ;)

tc -s -d qd show dev wlan0

tc qdisc replace dev wlan0 fq

This should temporarily help.

Re: Regression: TCP connections fail over wireless: bad cksum?

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-04 23:38:30

On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 16:28 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
tc -s -d qd show dev wlan0

tc qdisc replace dev wlan0 fq
I forgot the root keyword :

tc qdisc replace dev wlan0 root fq

Re: Regression: TCP connections fail over wireless: bad cksum?

From: Tom Herbert <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-05 03:41:15

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Ted Percival [off-list ref] wrote:
On 09/04/2014 04:50 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:11 -0600, Ted Percival wrote:
quoted
Yesterday's linux-next build introduced a problem with wireless
networking on my machine. ie. next-20140901 worked fine but
next-20140902 does not seem able to sustain a TCP connection over
wireless. Wired networking works fine. I am using the brcmsmac driver
and the hardware is "Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n Wireless
LAN Controller (rev 01)".

Pings, even large pings (ping -s 16000) work fine but TCP connections hang.

I looked through the changes between the bad & good commits from the net
& net-next trees and I wonder if some of the changes to checksumming
have surfaced a problem with this driver. When I look at a tcpdump, it
indicates that all the checksums are wrong (although I don't know if
that is just due to hardware offload).

Here is a short trace of the hung connection attempt of
  curl http://lwn.net/

$ sudo tcpdump -vvn -i wlan0 port 80
tcpdump: listening on wlan0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
65535 bytes
13:20:15.120770 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22734, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x4fac), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 142315 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:16.121755 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22735, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x4bc3), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 143316 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:18.125748 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22736, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x43ef), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 145320 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:22.133743 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22737, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x3447), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 149328 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
13:20:30.149754 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 22738, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto TCP (6), length 60)
    10.5.51.93.38035 > 72.51.34.34.80: Flags [S], cksum 0xa7e5
(incorrect -> 0x14f7), seq 2861986597, win 29200, options [mss
1460,sackOK,TS val 157344 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0


I don't see anything that looks related in dmesg. The only brcmsmac
messages I see are:

[  567.122218] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcmsmac: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed:
associated
[  567.122226] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: arp
filtering: 1 addresses (implement)
[  567.122231] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: qos
enabled: true (implement)
[  567.192283] brcmsmac bcma0:0: brcms_ops_bss_info_changed: qos
enabled: true (implement)

I am writing to linux-netdev rather than linux-wireless because
according to Next/SHA1s the wireless & wireless-next trees were not
updated between next-20140901 and next-20140902, but the net & net-next
trees were updated, so maybe the regression came from there. (I haven't
tested next-20140903 because it won't boot for unrelated reasons.)

Let me know if I should just file this in Bugzilla or what information I
can provide to help track this down, if it hasn't already been identified.

The here are the good (-) and bad (+) trees from Next/SHA1s at the
next-* tags mentioned earlier that I built from.

-net            38ab1fa981d543e1b00f4ffbce4ddb480cd2effe
+net            cc25f0cbe4409d6a573b1f3bf7020d5b04076ee9

-net-next       dace1b54726bffe1c009f7661e3cee6b762f30c8
+net-next       364a9e93243d1785f310c0964af0e24bf1adac03
Could you post

ethtool -k wlan0

And try

ethtool -K wlan tx off
# ethtool -k wlan0
Features for wlan0:
rx-checksumming: off [fixed]
tx-checksumming: off
        tx-checksum-ipv4: off [fixed]
        tx-checksum-ip-generic: off [fixed]
        tx-checksum-ipv6: off [fixed]
        tx-checksum-fcoe-crc: off [fixed]
        tx-checksum-sctp: off [fixed]
scatter-gather: off
        tx-scatter-gather: off [fixed]
        tx-scatter-gather-fraglist: off [fixed]
tcp-segmentation-offload: off
        tx-tcp-segmentation: off [fixed]
        tx-tcp-ecn-segmentation: off [fixed]
        tx-tcp6-segmentation: off [fixed]
udp-fragmentation-offload: off [fixed]
generic-segmentation-offload: off [requested on]
generic-receive-offload: on
large-receive-offload: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-offload: off [fixed]
tx-vlan-offload: off [fixed]
ntuple-filters: off [fixed]
receive-hashing: off [fixed]
highdma: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-filter: off [fixed]
vlan-challenged: off [fixed]
tx-lockless: off [fixed]
netns-local: on [fixed]
tx-gso-robust: off [fixed]
tx-fcoe-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-gre-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-ipip-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-sit-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-udp_tnl-segmentation: off [fixed]
tx-mpls-segmentation: off [fixed]
fcoe-mtu: off [fixed]
tx-nocache-copy: off
loopback: off [fixed]
rx-fcs: off [fixed]
rx-all: off [fixed]
tx-vlan-stag-hw-insert: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-stag-hw-parse: off [fixed]
rx-vlan-stag-filter: off [fixed]
l2-fwd-offload: off [fixed]
busy-poll: off [fixed]

# ethtool -K wlan0 tx off
Cannot change tx-checksumming

I will try to isolate the commit that caused the regression.
Please provide 'netstat -s' to see if bad checksums are being
reported. Also, try disabling GRO to see the effect.

Thanks,
Tom
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Regression: TCP connections fail over wireless: bad cksum?

From: Eric Dumazet <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-05 04:38:26

On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 20:41 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
Please provide 'netstat -s' to see if bad checksums are being
reported. Also, try disabling GRO to see the effect.
Most probably this is already fixed in net-next tree

http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=1f59533f9ca5634e7b8914252e48aee9d9cbe501

Solved: Regression: TCP connections fail over wireless: bad checksum

From: Ted Percival <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-05 15:28:22

On 09/04/2014 10:38 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Most probably this is already fixed in net-next tree

http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/commit/?id=1f59533f9ca5634e7b8914252e48aee9d9cbe501
Yep. 50cbe9ab5f8d was the regressing commit and cherry-picking that
commit on top of it solves the problem.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help