Hi All,
This commit:
commit 4dc78c437a0a2ac152a2b2c5e91a814a6ef3599e
Author: Sujith Manoharan [off-list ref]
Date: Wed Dec 18 09:53:26 2013 +0530
ath9k: Fix RTC reset delay
The delay that is required after issuing a RTC reset
varies for each chip. Handle this properly.
Signed-off-by: Sujith Manoharan [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville [off-list ref]
adds a udelay(10000) call to the ath9k driver. This will cause a
build error on various ARM configs because the value passed to udelay
is too large:
ERROR: "__bad_udelay" [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k_hw.ko] undefined!
make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
make: *** [modules] Error 2
Is the 10000 microsecond udelay really required? I believe the limit
on ARM is 2000. Perhaps something else could be done in this case?
josh
Josh Boyer wrote:
adds a udelay(10000) call to the ath9k driver. This will cause a
build error on various ARM configs because the value passed to udelay
is too large:
ERROR: "__bad_udelay" [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k_hw.ko] undefined!
make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
make: *** [modules] Error 2
Is the 10000 microsecond udelay really required? I believe the limit
on ARM is 2000. Perhaps something else could be done in this case?
The delay is a workaround for a HW issue. Does this patch fix the problem ?
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
index fbf43c0..11eab9f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
@@ -1316,7 +1316,7 @@ static bool ath9k_hw_set_reset(struct ath_hw *ah, int type)
if (AR_SREV_9300_20_OR_LATER(ah))
udelay(50);
else if (AR_SREV_9100(ah))
- udelay(10000);
+ mdelay(10);
else
udelay(100);
@@ -2051,9 +2051,8 @@ static bool ath9k_hw_set_power_awake(struct ath_hw *ah)
REG_SET_BIT(ah, AR_RTC_FORCE_WAKE,
AR_RTC_FORCE_WAKE_EN);
-
if (AR_SREV_9100(ah))
- udelay(10000);
+ mdelay(10);
else
udelay(50);
Sujith
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Sujith Manoharan [off-list ref] wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
quoted
adds a udelay(10000) call to the ath9k driver. This will cause a
build error on various ARM configs because the value passed to udelay
is too large:
ERROR: "__bad_udelay" [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k_hw.ko] undefined!
make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
make: *** [modules] Error 2
Is the 10000 microsecond udelay really required? I believe the limit
on ARM is 2000. Perhaps something else could be done in this case?
The delay is a workaround for a HW issue. Does this patch fix the problem ?
It fixes the build error, yes. I don't have actual HW to test, but
the driver compiles on ARM now with the same config as before.
Thanks!
josh
quoted hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
index fbf43c0..11eab9f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
@@ -1316,7 +1316,7 @@ static bool ath9k_hw_set_reset(struct ath_hw *ah, int type)
if (AR_SREV_9300_20_OR_LATER(ah))
udelay(50);
else if (AR_SREV_9100(ah))
- udelay(10000);
+ mdelay(10);
else
udelay(100);
@@ -2051,9 +2051,8 @@ static bool ath9k_hw_set_power_awake(struct ath_hw *ah)
REG_SET_BIT(ah, AR_RTC_FORCE_WAKE,
AR_RTC_FORCE_WAKE_EN);
-
if (AR_SREV_9100(ah))
- udelay(10000);
+ mdelay(10);
else
udelay(50);
Sujith