DORMANTno replies

[PATCH net-next] dlm: use {lock|release}_sock instead, sctp_{lock|release}_sock

From: Wang Weidong <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-21 09:32:21
Subsystem: distributed lock manager (dlm), filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), the rest · Maintainers: Alexander Aring, David Teigland, Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Linus Torvalds

As we remove the macros sctp_{lock|release}_sock in sctp.h, so change the use
in dlm as well.

This is a followup to ("sctp: remove macros sctp_{lock|release}_sock").

Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <redacted>
---
 fs/dlm/lowcomms.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
index d90909e..ce53dff 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lowcomms.c
@@ -713,11 +713,11 @@ static void process_sctp_notification(struct connection *con,
 				return;
 
 			/* Peel off a new sock */
-			sctp_lock_sock(con->sock->sk);
+			lock_sock(con->sock->sk);
 			ret = sctp_do_peeloff(con->sock->sk,
 				sn->sn_assoc_change.sac_assoc_id,
 				&new_con->sock);
-			sctp_release_sock(con->sock->sk);
+			release_sock(con->sock->sk);
 			if (ret < 0) {
 				log_print("Can't peel off a socket for "
 					  "connection %d to node %d: err=%d",
-- 
1.7.12
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help