DORMANTno replies

[PATCH net-next 15/20] net: seeq: slight optimization of addr compare

From: Ding Tianhong <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-27 06:52:36
Also in: lkml
Subsystem: networking drivers, the rest · Maintainers: Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
to instead of memcmp.

Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
index c765718..ced5b13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/sgiseeq.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static inline void sgiseeq_rx(struct net_device *dev, struct sgiseeq_private *sp
 		if (pkt_status & SEEQ_RSTAT_FIG) {
 			/* Packet is OK. */
 			/* We don't want to receive our own packets */
-			if (memcmp(rd->skb->data + 6, dev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN)) {
+			if (!ether_addr_equal(rd->skb->data + 6, dev->dev_addr)) {
 				if (len > rx_copybreak) {
 					skb = rd->skb;
 					newskb = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, PKT_BUF_SZ);
-- 
1.8.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help