The bond_select_active_slave() will not release and acquire
bond lock, so it is no need to read the bond lock for them,
and the bond_store_primaryxxx() is already in RTNL, so remove the
unwanted lock.
Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <redacted>
Suggested-by: Veaceslav Falico <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <redacted>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
index 75dc4d0..4838a97 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c
@@ -1069,7 +1069,6 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_primary(struct device *d,
if (!rtnl_trylock())
return restart_syscall();
block_netpoll_tx();
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) {@@ -1109,7 +1108,6 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_primary(struct device *d,
bond->dev->name, ifname, bond->dev->name);
out:
write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
unblock_netpoll_tx();
rtnl_unlock();
@@ -1157,11 +1155,9 @@ static ssize_t bonding_store_primary_reselect(struct device *d,
new_value);
block_netpoll_tx();
- read_lock(&bond->lock);
write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
bond_select_active_slave(bond);
write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
- read_unlock(&bond->lock);
unblock_netpoll_tx();
out:
rtnl_unlock();
--
1.8.2.1