Re: [PATCH] update consumers of MSG_MORE to recognize MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST
From: Shawn Landden <hidden>
Date: 2013-11-26 02:43:56
Also in:
linux-crypto, linux-fsdevel, lkml, stable
From: Shawn Landden <hidden>
Date: 2013-11-26 02:43:56
Also in:
linux-crypto, linux-fsdevel, lkml, stable
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Shawn Landden [off-list ref] wrote:
Commit 35f9c09fe (tcp: tcp_sendpages() should call tcp_push() once) added an internal flag MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST, similar to MSG_MORE. algif_hash, algif_skcipher, and udp used MSG_MORE from tcp_sendpages() and need to see the new flag as identical to MSG_MORE. This fixes sendfile() on AF_ALG. v3: also fix udp Cc: Tom Herbert <redacted> Cc: Eric Dumazet <redacted> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: <redacted> # 3.4.x + 3.2.x Reported-and-tested-by: Shawn Landden <redacted> Original-patch: Richard Weinberger [off-list ref] Signed-off-by: Shawn Landden <redacted>
May I ask why you took over the my patch without even CC'in me nor replying to the original thread "[PATCH] pipe_to_sendpage: Ensure that MSG_MORE is set if we set MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST"? You are acting very rude.
Not CCing you was an oversight.
The discussion at the original thread is not done. Does skcipher_sendpage() really also need fixing? or UDP?
UDP needs it or it will send out packets mid-sendfile. skcipher needs it or it will produce incorrect output like hash.
I didn't send another patch because I'm waiting for Eric's answer first.
Eric forgot to update consumers internal consumers of MSG_MORE when he created this distinction in sendpage. That became clear when he first responded. Changing this where the consumers are makes sense. I just want this bug fixed, feel free to send your next version.
Thanks, //richard
-Shawn